Cluster Analysis of the Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English: A Comparison of Methods

This article examines the feasibility of an empirical approach to sociolinguistic analysis of the Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English using exploratory multivariate methods. It addresses a known problem with one class of such methods, hierarchical cluster analysis?that different clustering algorithms can yield different analyses of the same data set, and that there is no obvious way of selecting the best one. The proposed solution is to analyze the data using hierarchical methods in conjunction with one or more fundamentally different types of clustering method, and then to select the analysis on which the hierarchical and the other method(s) agree most closely. A dimensionality reduction method, the self-organizing map (SOM), is used to exemplify this approach. The result is a close though not perfect match between the SOM and complete-link hierarchical analyses, but there is an important reservation?the SOM results vary with changes in user-defined training parameters, and are consequently also open to the criticism of inconsistency. The SOM cannot therefore be an objective arbiter for hierarchical clustering, but the analysis on which they agree gives a better basis for understanding the structure of the data than either method can provide on its own.

[1]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[2]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[3]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling , 2000 .

[4]  D. Wishart Fortran II programs for 8 methods of cluster analysis(clustan I) , 1969 .

[5]  Alfred Ultsch,et al.  Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery with Emergent Self-Organizing Feature Maps for Multivariate Time Series , 1999 .

[6]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[7]  Barbara M. H. Strang,et al.  A dynamic modelling of linguistic variation: The urban (Tyneside) linguistic survey , 1972 .

[8]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[9]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Bibliography of Self-Organizing Map (SOM) Papers: 1981-1997 , 1998 .

[10]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[11]  T. Kohonen,et al.  Bibliography of Self-Organizing Map SOM) Papers: 1998-2001 Addendum , 2003 .

[12]  Alfred Ultsch,et al.  U *-Matrix : a Tool to visualize Clusters in high dimensional Data , 2004 .

[13]  Lesley Milroy,et al.  PHONOLOGYCAL VARIATION AND CHANGE IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH: EVIDENCE FROM NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE AND DERBY , 1999 .

[14]  Valerie M. Jones Some problems in the computation of sociolinguistic data , 1978 .

[15]  Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 2003 .

[16]  Juha Vesanto,et al.  SOM-based data visualization methods , 1999, Intell. Data Anal..

[17]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[18]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.