EVALUATION OF STATISTICAL AND GEOSTATISTICALMODELS OF DIGITAL SOIL PROPERTIES MAPPING INTROPICAL MOUNTAIN REGIONS

SUMMARY Soil properties have an enormous impact on economic and environmental aspects of agricultural production. Quantitative relationships between soil properties and the factors that influence their variability are the basis of digital soil mapping. The predictive models of soil properties evaluated in this work are statistical (multiple linear regression-MLR) and geostatistical (ordinary kriging and co-kriging). The study was conducted in the municipality of Bom Jardim, RJ, using a soil database with 208 sampling points. Predictive models were evaluated for sand, silt and clay fractions, pH in water and organic carbon at six depths according to the specifications of the consortium of digital soil mapping at the global level (GlobalSoilMap). Continuous covariates and categorical predictors were used and their contributions to the model assessed. Only the environmental covariates elevation, aspect, stream power index (SPI), soil wetness index (SWI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and b3/b2 band ratio were significantly correlated with soil properties. The predictive models had a mean coefficient of determination of 0.21. Best results were obtained with the geostatistical predictive models, where the highest coefficient of determination 0.43 was associated with sand properties between 60 to 100 cm deep. The use of a sparse data set of soil properties for digital mapping can explain only part of the spatial variation of these properties. The results may be related to the sampling density and the quantity and quality of the environmental covariates and predictive models used.

[1]  N. Toomanian,et al.  Using Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to identify the most important DEM attributes for digi , 2011 .

[2]  A. McBratney,et al.  Chapter 32 Digital Mapping of Soil Attributes for Regional and Catchment Modelling, using Ancillary Covariates, Statistical and Geostatistical Techniques , 2006 .

[3]  Ciro Alexandre Ávila,et al.  Geoquímica e geocronologia do granitóide Barra Alegre, faixa móvel Ribeira, Rio de Janeiro , 2007 .

[4]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[5]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps , 2001 .

[6]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Mapping continuous depth functions of soil carbon storage and available water capacity , 2009 .

[7]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Digital soil mapping : an introductory perspective , 2007 .

[8]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Relationships in soil distribution as revealed by a global soil database , 2009 .

[9]  S. Erşahin Comparing Ordinary Kriging and Cokriging to Estimate Infiltration Rate , 2003 .

[10]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Predicting soil properties in the tropics , 2011 .

[11]  Modelling the distribution of organic carbon in the soils of Chile , 2012 .

[12]  Mapping the occurrence and thickness of soil horizons within soil profiles , 2012 .

[13]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  Incorporation of spectral data into multivariate geostatistical models to map soil phosphorus variability in a Florida wetland , 2007 .

[14]  Edzer J. Pebesma,et al.  Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  Gerson Manoel Muniz de Matos,et al.  Projeto Faixa Calcária Cordeiro / Cantagalo , 1980 .

[16]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  Temporal trajectories of phosphorus and pedo-patterns mapped in Water Conservation Area 2, Everglades, Florida, USA , 2008 .

[17]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Analysis and prediction of soil properties using local regression-kriging , 2012 .

[18]  B. Huwe,et al.  Uncertainty in the spatial prediction of soil texture: Comparison of regression tree and Random Forest models , 2012 .

[19]  George F. Jenks,et al.  ERROR ON CHOROPLETHIC MAPS: DEFINITION, MEASUREMENT, REDUCTION , 1971 .

[20]  P. Goovaerts Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives , 1999 .

[21]  Tomislav Hengl,et al.  Methods to interpolate soil categorical variables from profile observations: Lessons from Iran , 2007 .

[22]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey , 2000 .

[23]  Spatial prediction of soil organic carbon of Crete by using geostatistics , 2012 .

[24]  R. Reese Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[25]  Documenting GlobalSoilMap.net grid cells from legacy measured soil profile and global available covariates in Northern Tunisia , 2012 .

[26]  Lionel Mabit,et al.  Spatial variability of erosion and soil organic matter content estimated from 137Cs measurements and geostatistics , 2008 .

[27]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Chapter 1 Spatial Soil Information Systems and Spatial Soil Inference Systems: Perspectives for Digital Soil Mapping , 2006 .