Comparing cone-beam CT intensity correction methods for dose recalculation in adaptive intensity-modulated photon and proton therapy for head and neck cancer

ABSTRACT Background. Adaptive intensity-modulated photon and proton radiotherapy (IMRT and IMPT) of head and neck (H&N) cancer requires frequent three-dimensional (3D) dose calculation. We compared two approaches for dose recalculation on the basis of intensity-corrected cone-beam (CB) x-ray computed tomography (CT) images. Material and methods. For nine H&N tumor patients, virtual CTs (vCT) were generated by deformable image registration of the planning CT (pCT) to the CBCT. The second intensity correction approach used population-based lookup tables for scaling CBCT intensities to the pCT HU range (CBCTLUT). IMRT and IMPT plans were generated with a commercial treatment planning system. Dose recalculations on vCT and CBCTLUT were analyzed using a (3%, 3 mm) gamma-index analysis and comparison of normal tissue and tumor dose/volume parameters. A replanning CT (rpCT) acquired within three days of the CBCT served as reference. Single field uniform dose (SFUD) proton plans were created and recalculated on vCT and CBCTLUT for proton range comparison. Results. Dose/volume parameters showed minor differences between rpCT, vCT and CBCTLUT in IMRT, but clinically relevant deviations between CBCTLUT and rpCT in the spinal cord for IMPT. Gamma-index pass-rates were found increased for vCT with respect to CBCTLUT in IMPT (by up to 21 percentage points) and IMRT (by up to 9 percentage points) for most cases. The SFUD-based proton range assessment showed improved agreement of vCT and rpCT, with 88–99% of the depth dose profiles in beam's eye view agreeing within 3 mm. For CBCTLUT, only 80–94% of the profiles fulfilled this criterion. Conclusion. vCT and CBCTLUT are suitable options for dose recalculation in adaptive IMRT. In the scope of IMPT, the vCT approach is preferable.

[1]  Markus Stock,et al.  Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  D. Yeung,et al.  Proton therapy for head and neck cancer: Rationale, potential indications, practical considerations, and current clinical evidence , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[3]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation. , 2015, Medical physics.

[4]  Martin J. Murphy,et al.  Reconstruction of a cone-beam CT image via forward iterative projection matching , 2010 .

[5]  Alen Docef,et al.  Reconstruction of a cone-beam CT image via forward iterative projection matching. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  Lei Xing,et al.  Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Deformable image registration of CT and truncated cone-beam CT for adaptive radiation therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  G C Sharp,et al.  Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification. , 2014, Medical physics.

[9]  Laurent Jacques,et al.  Diffeomorphic Registration of Images with Variable Contrast Enhancement , 2010, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[10]  Di Yan,et al.  Automatic delineation of on-line head-and-neck computed tomography images: toward on-line adaptive radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Maria Francesca Spadea,et al.  Automatic segmentation and online virtualCT in head-and-neck adaptive radiation therapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  R. Mohan,et al.  Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  M. Stock,et al.  ART for head and neck patients: On the difference between VMAT and IMPT , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[14]  Holly Ning,et al.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  D Verellen,et al.  An overview of volumetric imaging technologies and their quality assurance for IGRT , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[16]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  Scale invariant feature transform in adaptive radiation therapy: a tool for deformable image registration assessment and re-planning indication , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Morphons: Paint on Priors and Elastic Canvas for Segmentation and Registration , 2005, SCIA.

[18]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations. , 2014, Medical physics.

[19]  Cai Grau,et al.  Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[20]  J. Petersen,et al.  The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region – a phantom study , 2014, Acta oncologica.

[21]  Cai Grau,et al.  Daily kV cone-beam CT and deformable image registration as a method for studying dosimetric consequences of anatomic changes in adaptive IMRT of head and neck cancer , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[22]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Phantom based evaluation of CT to CBCT image registration for proton therapy dose recalculation , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  S. Nill,et al.  A clinical concept for interfractional adaptive radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Qiuwen Wu,et al.  Adaptive replanning strategies accounting for shrinkage in head and neck IMRT. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.