Forecasting air pollutant indicator levels with geographic models 3 days in advance using neural networks

An early warning system for air quality control requires an accurate and dependable forecasting of pollutants in the air. In this study methods based on geographic forecasting models using neural networks (GFM_NN) are presented. The air pollutant data from 10 different air quality monitoring stations in Istanbul was used in forecasting sulfur dioxide (SO"2), carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM"1"0) levels 3days in advance for the Besiktas district. Daily meteorological forecasts as well as the air pollutant indicator values were used as input to feed-forward back-propagation neural networks. The experimental verification of the models was conducted in one-year period between August 2005 and August 2006. The observed and forecasted bands were used to compute the forecasting error. The simplest geographic model proposed uses the observed air pollution indicator values from a selected neighboring district. Where as the second model uses two neighboring districts instead of one. A third model considers the distance between the triangulating districts and the district whose air pollutant level is being forecasted. Each model is tested with at least two different sets of sites. The findings are quite satisfactory. When the right neighboring districts are chosen, the geographic models always yield lower error than non-geographic models. The distance-based geographic model produces considerably lower error than the non-geographic plain model. We argue that models proposed here can be used in urban air pollution forecasting.

[1]  Asha B. Chelani,et al.  Prediction of sulphur dioxide concentration using artificial neural networks , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Ferhat Karaca,et al.  An online air pollution forecasting system using neural networks. , 2008, Environment international.

[3]  Mahmut Bayramoglu,et al.  Adaptive neuro-fuzzy based modelling for prediction of air pollution daily levels in city of Zonguldak. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[4]  Omar Alagha,et al.  NN-AirPol: a neural-networks-based method for air pollution evaluation and control , 2006 .

[5]  Gavin C. Cawley,et al.  Modelling SO2 concentration at a point with statistical approaches , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Ferhat Karaca,et al.  AirPolTool: A WEB-BASED TOOL FOR ISTANBUL AIR POLLUTION FORECASTING AND CONTROL , 2005 .

[7]  N Künzli,et al.  Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi,et al.  From diagnosis to prognosis for forecasting air pollution using neural networks: Air pollution monitoring in Bilbao , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Patricio Perez Prediction of sulfur dioxide concentrations at a site near downtown Santiago, Chile , 2001 .

[10]  Filippo Sorbello,et al.  Three hours ahead prevision of SO2 pollutant concentration using an Elman neural based forecaster , 2008 .

[11]  Ferhat Karaca,et al.  Application of Inductive Learning: Air Pollution Forecast in Istanbul, Turkey , 2005, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput..

[12]  Yun Zeng,et al.  Progress in developing an ANN model for air pollution index forecast , 2004 .

[13]  M. Gardner,et al.  Neural network modelling and prediction of hourly NOx and NO2 concentrations in urban air in London , 1999 .

[14]  Stephen Dorling,et al.  Artificial Neural Network-Derived Trends in Daily Maximum Surface Ozone Concentrations , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  M. W Gardner,et al.  Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences , 1998 .

[16]  Manuel Febrero Bande,et al.  Prediction of SO2 Levels Using Neural Networks , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.