The double oval UV auroral distribution. 1: Implications for the mapping of auroral arcs

During the later stages of the auroral substorm the luminosity distribution frequently resembles a double oval, one oval lying poleward of the normal or main UV auroral oval. We interpret the double oval morphology as being due to the plasma sheet boundary layer becoming active in the later stages of the substorm process. If the disturbance engulfs the nightside low-latitude boundary layers, then the double oval configuration extends into the dayside ionospheric region. The main UV oval is associated with the inner portion of the central plasma sheet and can rapidly change its auroral character from being diffuse to discrete. This transition is associated with the substorm process and is fundamental to understanding the near-Earth character of substorm onset. On the other hand, the poleward arc system in the nightside ionosphere occurs adjacent to or near the open-closed field line boundary. This system activates at the end of the optical expansion phase and is a part of the recovery phase configuration in substorms where it occurs. These two source regions for nightside discrete auroral arcs are important in resolving the controversy concerning the mapping of arcs to the magnetosphere. The dayside extension of this double oval configuration is also investigated and shows particle signatures which differ considerably from those on the nightside giving clues to the magnetospheric source regions of the aurora in the two local time sectors. Near-Earth substorm onsets are shown to be coupled to processes occurring much further tailward and indicate the importance of understanding the temporal development of features within the double oval. Using “variance images,” a new technique for the investigation of these dynamics is outlined.

[1]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Auroral ionospheric signatures of the plasma sheet boundary layer in the evening sector , 1994 .

[2]  A. Lui,et al.  On the location of auroral arcs near substorm onsets , 1978 .

[3]  R. Nakamura,et al.  Equatorward and poleward expansion of the auroras during auroral substorms , 1993 .

[4]  L. Zelenyi,et al.  Pressure gradient structures in the tail neutral sheet as “roots of the arcs” with some effects of stochasticity , 1992 .

[5]  J. Craven,et al.  Latitudinal motions of the aurora during substorms , 1987 .

[6]  L. Zelenyi,et al.  Velocity‐dispersed ion beams in the nightside auroral zone: AUREOL 3 observations , 1990 .

[7]  M. S. Gussenhoven,et al.  A statistical model of auroral ion precipitation , 1989 .

[8]  A. Viñas,et al.  The inner edge of the plasma sheet and the diffuse aurora , 1984 .

[9]  R. Elphinstone,et al.  Filamentary structure of the westward electrojet in the midnight sector auroral distribution during substorms: comparison with Viking auroral observations , 1993 .

[10]  R. D. Belian,et al.  Drifting holes in the energetic electron flux at geosynchronous orbit following substorm onset , 1992 .

[11]  Ramon Lopez,et al.  CDAW 9 analysis of magnetospheric events on May 3, 1986: Event C , 1993 .

[12]  C. Anger,et al.  EMISSIONS BY THE ISIS 2 SATELLITE IN THE 19-24 MLT SECTOR , 1977 .

[13]  C. Russell,et al.  Field‐aligned current signatures in the near‐tail region: 1. ISEE observations in the plasma sheet boundary layer , 1988 .

[14]  J. S. Murphree,et al.  Four large-scale field-aligned current systems in the dayside high-latitude region , 1995 .

[15]  Y. Feldstein,et al.  The auroral luminosity structure in the high-latitude upper atmosphere: Its dynamics and relationship to the large-scale structure of the Earth's magnetosphere , 1985 .

[16]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  The double oval UV auroral distribution: 2. The most poleward arc system and the dynamics of the magnetotail , 1995 .

[17]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Oval intensification event observed by STARE and Viking , 1993 .

[18]  N. A. Saflekos,et al.  The quiet time polar cap: DE 1 observations and conceptual model , 1992 .

[19]  R. Elphinstone,et al.  Correlative studies using the Viking imagery , 1988 .

[20]  R. Elphinstone,et al.  Mapping using the Tsyganenko Long Magnetospheric Model and its relationship to Viking auroral images , 1991 .

[21]  R. Elphinstone,et al.  Dayside aurora poleward of the main auroral distribution: Implications for convection and mapping , 1994 .

[22]  Nikolai A. Tsyganenko,et al.  GLOBAL QUANTITATIVE MODELS OF THE GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD IN THE CISLUNAR MAGNETOSPHERE FOR DIFFERENT DISTURBANCE LEVELS , 1987 .

[23]  N. Tsyganenko A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet , 1989 .

[24]  Y. Kamide,et al.  The auroral electrojet and global auroral features , 1975 .

[25]  L. Eliasson,et al.  Energetic particle precipitation in the substorm growth phase measured by EISCAT and Viking , 1990 .

[26]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Adiabatic acceleration induced by convection in the plasma sheet , 1978 .

[27]  J. Winningham,et al.  The latitudinal morphology of 10‐eV to 10‐keV electron fluxes during magnetically quiet and disturbed times in the 2100–0300 MLT sector , 1975 .

[28]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Morning sector ion precipitation following substorm injections , 1981 .

[29]  P. Lindqvist,et al.  Electron populations above the nightside auroral oval during magnetic quiet times , 1990 .

[30]  R. Elphinstone,et al.  The auroral distribution and its mapping according to substorm phase , 1993 .

[31]  V. Sigillito,et al.  The auroral oval position, structure, and intensity of precipitation from 1984 onward: An automated on‐line data base , 1991 .

[32]  J. Winningham,et al.  Bands of ions and angular V's: A conjugate manifestation of ionospheric ion acceleration , 1984 .