Can treadmill walking be used to assess propulsion generation?

Instrumented treadmills offer significant advantages for analysis of human locomotion, including recording consecutive steady-state gait cycles, precisely controlling walking speed, and avoiding force plate targeting. However, some studies of hemiparetic walking on a treadmill have suggested that the moving treadmill belt may fundamentally alter propulsion mechanics. Any differences in propulsion mechanics during treadmill walking would be problematic since recent studies assessing propulsion have provided fundamental insight into hemiparetic walking. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that there would be no difference in the generation of anterior/posterior (A/P) propulsion by performing a carefully controlled comparison of the A/P ground reaction forces (GRFs) and impulses in healthy adults during treadmill and overground walking. Gait data were collected from eight subjects walking overground and on a treadmill with speed and cadence controlled. Peak negative and positive horizontal GRFs in early and late stance, respectively, were reduced by less than 5% of body weight (p<0.05) during treadmill walking compared to overground walking. The magnitude of the braking impulse was similarly lower (p<0.05) during treadmill walking, but no significant difference was found between propulsion impulses. While there were some subtle differences in A/P GRFs between overground and treadmill walking, these results suggest there is no fundamental difference in propulsion mechanics. We conclude that treadmill walking can be used to investigate propulsion generation in healthy and by implication clinical populations.

[1]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  R. Kram,et al.  Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Motoki Kouzaki,et al.  Variability of ground reaction forces during treadmill walking. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Anterior-Posterior Ground Reaction Forces as a Measure of Paretic Leg Contribution in Hemiparetic Walking , 2006, Stroke.

[5]  Jill Whitall,et al.  Improved Hemiparetic Muscle Activation in Treadmill versus Overground Walking , 2004, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[6]  Murray Mp,et al.  Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Lindsey J Turns,et al.  Relationships between muscle activity and anteroposterior ground reaction forces in hemiparetic walking. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  F. Alton,et al.  A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Taeyou Jung,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of treadmill and overground walking in children with and without cerebral palsy : implications for treadmill-based gait intervention , 2003 .

[10]  U. Croce,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[11]  Anouk Lamontagne,et al.  Speed and Temporal-Distance Adaptations during Treadmill and Overground Walking Following Stroke , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  E. Chao,et al.  Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.