Video interaction: a research agenda

The topic of this special issue is the broadened use of video and the need to articulate a research agenda that addresses its new opportunities and challenges. This agenda, which we argue should be labelled ‘‘video interaction,’’ is influenced by both emerging practices and technical developments. In the widest sense, we refer to video interaction as a research area concerned with emerging technologies and social practices in an increasingly flattened hierarchy between, on the one hand, what used to be a well-defined group of production professionals, and on the other hand, the masses of passive viewers of the same media. This transition happens at the same time as video traffic has become the bulk of data communication on the Internet [2]. The same shift is now happening in mobile data. Cisco reports that mobile video traffic exceeded 50 % for the first time in 2012. They predict that the numbers for video will continue to increase dramatically. In 5 years, the amount of mobile video data is projected to increase 16-fold, ending up at over two-thirds of the entire data traffic [12]. Obviously, downloading and streaming of movies and TV series are the big drivers in this development, but there are a number of other things happening that warrant a new approach to understanding interaction with video content, beyond the notion of the user as a viewer in the traditional sense. The practices surrounding moving image technology are now transcending consumption of traditional media, and becoming integrated with other interactive services and social media [2]. In this massive growth of video online, there are a number of parallel trends regarding how video is consumed, produced, shared, and interacted with that we argue require a re-conceptualisation of the area. In the following, we will map out the changed use of video and then analyze its opportunities and challenges, and explain the need for a coherent research approach to video interaction. In particular, the trends we want to align are a shift to user-generated video content and to mobile technology, as well as a continuation of the trend of increased interaction in viewing (iTV). First, new ways of producing video content has emerged, enabled by the availability of cheap production tools and high bandwidth communication networks. It emerged with the use of both analogue and digital video cameras for consumers, and continued with video recording facilities on mobile phones [30]. The cost and effort of sharing and distributing the content have also diminished with the expansion of the fixed Internet. Live video production is now on the verge of the same kind of democratization of means of production and broader adoption by nonprofessional users. Through highly visible examples such as live broadcasts from the Arabic Spring and other news events around the world, as well as more mundane practices of broadcasting from university lectures and local events, live video has shown potential for communicating and sharing experiences with remote viewers. Second, we see an expansion of services that utilize mobile technology in a broad sense, and that are catering to O. Juhlin G. Zoric (&) A. Engstrom Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: goga@mobilelifecentre.org

[1]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Video Recording Practices and the Reflexive Constitution of the Interactional Order: Some Systematic Uses of the Split-Screen Technique , 2009 .

[2]  Chris Anderson,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[3]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  Playing, performing, reporting: a case study of mobile minimovies composed by teenage girls , 2008, OZCHI '08.

[4]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  Mobile TV: Customizing Content and Experience , 2010, Mobile TV: Customizing Content and Experience.

[5]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Mobile collaborative live video mixing , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[7]  Ville Ollikainen,et al.  Mobile TV in Everyday Life Contexts - Individual Entertainment or Shared Experiences? , 2007, EuroITV.

[8]  Erika Reponen,et al.  Mobile Video in Everyday Social Interactions , 2010, Mobile TV: Customizing Content and Experience.

[9]  Shingo Uchihashi,et al.  An interactive comic book presentation for exploring video , 2000, CHI.

[10]  Christopher M. Anderson,et al.  The web is dead. Long live the Internet , 2010 .

[11]  Louise Barkhuus,et al.  Panoramic video: design challenges and implications for content interaction , 2013, EuroITV.

[12]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  The mobile vision mixer: a mobile network based live video broadcasting system in your mobile phone , 2012, MUM.

[13]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[14]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  Using live video for information sharing in emergency response work , 2009 .

[15]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Effects of audio and visual surrogates for making sense of digital video , 2007, CHI.

[16]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  Information Sharing Using Live Video , 2009 .

[17]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  What's next?: emergent storytelling from video collection , 2009, CHI.

[18]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  Take today; the executive as dropout , 1972 .

[19]  Y. Benkler,et al.  Commons‐based Peer Production and Virtue* , 2006 .

[20]  Michael G. Christel,et al.  Evolving video skims into useful multimedia abstractions , 1998, CHI.

[21]  Audubon Dougherty,et al.  Live-streaming mobile video: production as civic engagement , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[22]  Rafael Ballagas,et al.  Practices in creating videos with mobile phones , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[23]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Mobile broadcasting: the whats and hows of live video as a social medium , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[24]  Mark J. Perry,et al.  Temporal hybridity: footage with instant replay in real time , 2010, CHI.

[25]  Duane Varan,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Interactivity in Television Drama , 2007, EuroITV.

[26]  Konstantinos Chorianopoulos,et al.  Learn and play with interactive TV , 2007, CIE.

[27]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Everyday practices with mobile video telephony , 2006, CHI.

[28]  Xiaobo Liu,et al.  LONG LIVE THE INTERNET , 2012 .

[29]  Frank Bentley,et al.  Video interaction - making broadcasting a successful social media , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[30]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  Presence and engagement in an interactive drama , 2007, CHI.

[31]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[32]  Risto Sarvas,et al.  Snapshot video: everyday photographers taking short video-clips , 2008, NordiCHI.

[33]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Spinning online: a case study of internet broadcasting by DJs , 2009, C&T.

[34]  Jens F. Jensen Interactive television: new genres, new format, new content , 2005 .

[35]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[36]  Erika Reponen Live @ Dublin - Mobile Phone Live Video Group Communication Experiment , 2008, EuroITV.

[37]  Kris Luyten,et al.  Telebuddies: social stitching with interactive television , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[38]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  The collaborative work of producing meaningful shots in mobile video telephony , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[39]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Browsing digital video , 2000, CHI.

[40]  Muhammad Shakir,et al.  Video Summarization: Techniques and Classification , 2012, ICCVG.

[41]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Understanding videowork , 2007, CHI.

[42]  Mathias Broth,et al.  The production of a live TV-interview through mediated interaction , 2004 .

[43]  Mark J. Perry,et al.  Amateur vision and recreational orientation:: creating live video together , 2012, CSCW '12.

[44]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Video browsing by direct manipulation , 2008, CHI.

[45]  Mark J. Perry,et al.  Lean collaboration through video gestures: co-ordinating the production of live televised sport , 2009, CHI.

[46]  Priscilla S. Markwood,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[47]  V. Carrington Literacy in the New Media Age , 2005 .