Evaluating Morphological Computation in Muscle and DC-Motor Driven Models of Hopping Movements

In the context of embodied artificial intelligence, morphological computation refers to processes which are conducted by the body (and environment) that otherwise would have to be performed by the brain. Exploiting environmental and morphological properties is an important feature of embodied systems. The main reason is that it allows to significantly reduce the controller complexity. An important aspect of morphological computation is that it cannot be assigned to an embodied system per se, but that it is, as we show, behavior- and state-dependent. In this work, we evaluate two different measures of morphological computation that can be applied in robotic systems and in computer simulations of biological movement. As an example, these measures were evaluated on muscle and DC-motor driven hopping models. We show that a state-dependent analysis of the hopping behaviors provides additional insights that cannot be gained from the averaged measures alone. This work includes algorithms and computer code for the measures.

[1]  Nihat Ay,et al.  The Umwelt of an embodied agent—a measure-theoretic definition , 2015, Theory in Biosciences.

[2]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Relevant information in optimized persistence vs. progeny strategies , 2006 .

[3]  R. Wootton.  FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF INSECT WINGS , 1992 .

[4]  Keyan Zahedi,et al.  Causal Effects for Prediction and Deliberative Decision Making of Embodied Systems , 2013 .

[5]  Ralf Der,et al.  Higher Coordination With Less Control—A Result of Information Maximization in the Sensorimotor Loop , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[6]  A. Seyfarth,et al.  Integration of intrinsic muscle properties, feed-forward and feedback signals for generating and stabilizing hopping , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Ray H Baughman.  Materials science. Playing nature's game with artificial muscles. , 2005, Science.

[8]  N. Ay,et al.  An Information Theoretic Approach to Prediction and Deliberative Decision Making of Embodied Systems , 2011 .

[9]  Maarten F. Bobbert,et al.  The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Intrinsic muscle properties facilitate locomotor control - a computer simulation study. , 1998, Motor control.

[11]  Louis Sokoloff,et al.  Circulation and Energy Metabolism of the Brain , 1999 .

[12]  A. Clark.  Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[13]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Organization of the information flow in the perception-action loop of evolved agents , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware, 2004..

[14]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Preparing the leg for ground contact in running: the contribution of feed-forward and visual feedback , 2015, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  S. Kety,et al.  The circulation and energy metabolism of the brain. , 1963, Clinical neurosurgery.

[16]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  Kan Li,et al.  Restoring Behavior via Inverse Neurocontroller in a Lesioned Cortical Spiking Model Driving a Virtual Arm , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[18]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Jill S Higginson,et al.  Stabilisation of walking by intrinsic muscle properties revealed in a three-dimensional muscle-driven simulation , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[20]  N. Ay,et al.  On the Causal Structure of the Sensorimotor Loop , 2014 .

[21]  Daniel Polani,et al.  An informational perspective on how the embodiment can relieve cognitive burden , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALIFE).

[22]  Syn Schmitt,et al.  Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Biological Muscle – A Simple Model Approach , 2015 .

[23]  Syn Schmitt,et al.  Theoretical Hill-Type Muscle and Stability: Numerical Model and Application , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[24]  P. Holmes,et al.  Reflexes and preflexes: on the role of sensory feedback on rhythmic patterns in insect locomotion , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  Gerhard Neumann,et al.  Stochastic Optimal Control Methods for Investigating the Power of Morphological Computation , 2013, Artificial Life.

[26]  Keyan Zahedi,et al.  Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Quantifying Morphological Computation based on an Information Decomposition of the Sensorimotor Loop , 2015 .

[27]  Keyan Zahedi,et al.  Quantifying Morphological Computation , 2013, Entropy.

[28]  Jeroen B. J. Smeets,et al.  Conclusions on motor control depend on the type of model used to represent the periphery , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  Eckehard Olbrich,et al.  Quantifying unique information , 2013, Entropy.

[30]  Alexander Spröwitz,et al.  Exciting Engineered Passive Dynamics in a Bipedal Robot , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[31]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  How the body shapes the way we think - a new view on intelligence , 2006 .

[32]  L. Munari.  How the body shapes the way we think — a new view of intelligence , 2009 .

[33]  Keyan Zahedi,et al.  A Theory of Cheap Control in Embodied Systems , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[35]  A. Seyfarth,et al.  The role of intrinsic muscle properties for stable hopping—stability is achieved by the force–velocity relation , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[36]  L. Sokoloff,et al.  The effect of mental arithmetic on cerebral circulation and metabolism. , 1955, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[37]  Ray H. Baughman,et al.  Playing Nature's Game with Artificial Muscles , 2005, Science.

[38]  S Schmitt,et al.  Quantifying control effort of biological and technical movements: an information-entropy-based approach. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Biomechanical Approach to Open-Loop Bipedal Running with a Musculoskeletal Athlete Robot , 2012, Adv. Robotics.