Validation of projective mapping as potential sensory screening tool for application by the honeybush herbal tea industry.

Honeybush herbal tea is produced from the endemic South African Cyclopia species. Plant material subjected to a high-temperature oxidation step ("fermentation") forms the bulk of production. Production lags behind demand forcing tea merchants to use blends of available material to supply local and international markets. The distinct differences in the sensory profiles of the herbal tea produced from the different Cyclopia species require that special care is given to blending to ensure a consistent, high quality product. Although conventional descriptive sensory analysis (DSA) is highly effective in providing a detailed sensory profile of herbal tea infusions, industry requires a method that is more time- and cost-effective. Recent advances in sensory science have led to the development of rapid profiling methodologies. The question is whether projective mapping can successfully be used for the sensory characterisation of herbal tea infusions. Trained assessors performed global and partial projective mapping to determine the validity of this technique for the sensory characterisation of infusions of five Cyclopia species. Similar product configurations were obtained when comparing results of DSA and global and partial projective mapping. Comparison of replicate sessions showed RV coefficients >0.8. A similarity index, based on multifactor analysis, was calculated to determine assessor repeatability. Global projective mapping, demonstrated to be a valid method for providing a broad sensory characterisation of Cyclopia species, is thus suitable as a rapid quality control method of honeybush infusions. Its application by the honeybush industry could improve the consistency of the sensory profile of blended products.

[1]  Tormod Næs,et al.  A comparison of Generalised Procrustes Analysis and Multiple Factor Analysis for projective mapping data , 2015 .

[2]  M. Muller,et al.  Optimising high-temperature oxidation of Cyclopia species for maximum development of characteristic aroma notes of honeybush herbal tea infusions , 2017 .

[3]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Perceptual mapping of apples and cheeses using projective mapping and sorting. , 2010 .

[4]  T. Næs,et al.  Trained sensory panellists’ response to product alcohol content in the projective mapping task: Observations on alcohol content, product complexity and prior knowledge , 2014 .

[5]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  Rapid descriptive sensory methods – Comparison of Free Multiple Sorting, Partial Napping, Napping, Flash Profiling and conventional profiling , 2012 .

[6]  Conor M. Delahunty,et al.  Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present and future , 2001 .

[7]  F. J. Pérez Elortondo,et al.  Projective mapping in sensory analysis of ewes milk cheeses: A study on consumers and trained panel performance , 2004 .

[8]  B. Green,et al.  Oral astringency: a tactile component of flavor. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Use of Just-About-Right Scales in Consumer Research , 2014 .

[11]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[12]  G. Ares,et al.  Projective Mapping and Napping , 2014 .

[13]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[14]  E. Joubert,et al.  Optimization of the fermentation parameters of Honeybush tea (Cyclopia) , 1999 .

[15]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Real-life metabolomics data analysis : how to deal with complex data ? , 2010 .

[16]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling , 2014 .

[17]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Einar Risvik,et al.  Projective mapping: A tool for sensory analysis and consumer research , 1994 .

[19]  M. Muller,et al.  Optimisation and validation of high-temperature oxidation of Cyclopia intermedia (honeybush) – From laboratory to factory , 2017 .

[20]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley , 2005 .

[21]  Andreas Rytz,et al.  Sorting procedure as an alternative to quantitative descriptive analysis to obtain a product sensory map , 2006 .

[22]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Validation of two Napping techniques as rapid sensory screening tools for high alcohol products. , 2013 .

[23]  M. Muller,et al.  Sensory profile of rooibos originating from the Western and Northern Cape governed by production year and development of rooibos aroma wheel. , 2017 .

[24]  Lené M. Erasmus.  Development of sensory tools for quality grading of Cyclopia genistoides, C. longifolia, C. maculata and C. subternata herbal teas , 2015 .

[25]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception , 2010 .

[26]  Einar Risvik,et al.  Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping data , 1997 .

[27]  E. Joubert,et al.  Honeybush (Cyclopia spp.): From local cottage industry to global markets — The catalytic and supporting role of research , 2011 .

[28]  M. Muller,et al.  Sensory profiling of honeybush tea (Cyclopia species) and the development of a honeybush sensory wheel , 2014 .

[29]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Multiple factor analysis (AFMULT package) , 1994 .

[30]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire valley , 2008 .

[31]  Hildegarde Heymann,et al.  A summary of projective mapping observations – The effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements , 2013 .

[32]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumers , 2008 .

[33]  Paula Varela,et al.  Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. , 2010 .

[34]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications , 2007 .

[35]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science , 2010 .

[36]  J. Vlok,et al.  Fire-survival strategy — a character of taxonomic, ecological and evolutionary importance in fynbos legumes , 1995, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[37]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of rapid sensory characterization methodologies for the development of functional yogurts. , 2014, Food research international.

[38]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Sensory characterization of rooibos tea and the development of a rooibos sensory wheel and lexicon , 2012 .

[39]  Hildegarde Heymann,et al.  PROJECTIVE MAPPING AND DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF MILK AND DARK CHOCOLATES , 2009 .

[40]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Further investigations into the reproducibility of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization elicited by consumers , 2014 .