Hybridity as Design Strategy for Service Robots to Become Domestic Products

Service robots have yet to occupy niches in domestic environments beyond vacuuming and lawn mowing. This can only happen by providing an alternative experience rather than mimicking and competing with humans, pets and already available appliances. We argue that the robot's hybrid nature on a spectrum between 'thing' and 'being' is a suitable framework to create such a unique experience. More specifically, we argue that hybridity creates ambiguity which affords a wider range of practices to occur, from tool use to social interaction. We evaluate this idea in an online study with 61 participants who rated three robots with rather biomorphic (Pepper), hybrid (Sympartner) or device-like (Relay) appearance. Results show that the hybrid design affords a broader spectrum of use compared to designs inscribing to treat the robot as either possession or social companion. The study offers initial insights on ambiguity-through-hybridity as design strategy to help robots become domestic products.

[1]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[2]  T. Noseworthy,et al.  How context shapes category inferences and attribute preference for new ambiguous products , 2012 .

[3]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2013 .

[4]  James Auger,et al.  Living with robots , 2014, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[5]  Diana Löffler,et al.  Multimodal Expression of Artificial Emotion in Social Robots Using Color, Motion and Sound , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Nikolai Krementsov,et al.  On Metaphors, Animals, and Us , 1991 .

[7]  C. Hill,et al.  Affiliation motivation: people who need people ... but in different ways. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[9]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  The Greeting Machine: An Abstract Robotic Object for Opening Encounters , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[10]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[12]  Julia Fink,et al.  Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction , 2012, ICSR.

[13]  Myungsuk Kim,et al.  The Usage and Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Form in Robot Design , 2009 .

[14]  D. Ihde.  Technology and the lifeworld : from garden to earth , 1991 .

[15]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human–Robot Interaction , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[16]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[17]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[18]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  Better Than Human: About the Psychological Superpowers of Robots , 2016, ICSR.

[19]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).