Superstructure-free synthesis and optimization of distributed industrial energy supply systems

A novel approach is proposed for the superstructure-free synthesis and optimization of distributed energy supply systems (DESS) by exploiting the nature of evolutionary algorithms. Current approaches require the designer to define a superstructure, which subsequently is optimized. In the presented method, the a priori specification of a superstructure is avoided: A mutation operator employs generic replacement rules to replace parts of energy supply systems by alternative designs. To minimize both the number of replacement rules and meaningless design alternatives generated during mutation, all energy conversion technologies are classified into the so-called energy conversion hierarchy (ECH). The ECH allows for an efficient definition of all reasonable connections between the regarded components, and the definition of generic replacement rules. Thereby, the hierarchy-supported approach balances richness of the available design space and computational efficiency. In addition, the convenient description of the design space allows for an easy addition of technologies into the optimization problem. The proposed approach thus provides an expandable framework for optimizing DESS. The method is applied to the synthesis of a heating and cooling system. The presented approach efficiently solves retrofit and grassroots design problems. It automatically identifies complex solutions such as trigeneration demonstrating the power of the suggested optimization framework.

[1]  Sebastian Engell,et al.  Design of problem-specific evolutionary algorithm/mixed-integer programming hybrids: two-stage stochastic integer programming applied to chemical batch scheduling , 2007 .

[2]  Frank Pettersson,et al.  Structural and operational optimisation of distributed energy systems , 2006 .

[3]  Christos A. Frangopoulos,et al.  Optimization of energy systems based on Evolutionary and Social metaphors , 2008 .

[4]  Peter Mizsey,et al.  Toward a more realistic overall process synthesis—the combined approach , 1990 .

[5]  Tomio Umeda,et al.  A Thermodynamic Approach to Steam-Power System Design , 1980 .

[6]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multiobjective Design and Optimization of Urban Energy Systems , 2008 .

[7]  Hans-Georg Beyer,et al.  The Theory of Evolution Strategies , 2001, Natural Computing Series.

[8]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  A prototype expert system for the conceptual synthesis of thermal processes , 1997 .

[9]  Plamen Angelov,et al.  Evolutionary Synthesis of HVAC System Configurations: Algorithm Development (RP-1049) , 2008 .

[10]  Robin Smith,et al.  Chemical Process: Design and Integration , 2005 .

[11]  Andrzej Kraslawski,et al.  Case-based reasoning tool for the support of process and product design , 2005 .

[12]  William Johns,et al.  Computer‐Aided Chemical Engineering , 2011 .

[13]  Klaus Lucas,et al.  Multicriterial optimisation of communal energy supply concepts , 2007 .

[14]  Markus Völter,et al.  Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management , 2006 .

[15]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Advances in Energy Systems Engineering , 2011 .

[16]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Part II. Future perspective on optimization , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Jack Mostow,et al.  Toward Better Models of the Design Process , 1985, AI Mag..

[18]  Andrzej Kraslawski,et al.  Case-based selection of a model of a reverse flow reactor , 2010 .

[19]  Jeffrey J. Siirola,et al.  Process synthesis prospective , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[20]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Optimization of combined cycle power plants using evolutionary algorithms , 2007 .

[21]  Hartmut Ehrig,et al.  Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation: vol. 3: concurrency, parallelism, and distribution , 1999 .

[22]  Plamen P. Angelov,et al.  Automatic Design Synthesis and Optimization of Component-Based Systems by Evolutionary Algorithms , 2003, GECCO.

[23]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Flowsheet optimization with complex cost and size functions using process simulators , 2007 .

[24]  Consolación Gil,et al.  Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review , 2011 .

[25]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolution strategies – A comprehensive introduction , 2002, Natural Computing.

[26]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  A Brief Review of Methods for the Design and Synthesis Optimization of Energy Systems , 2002 .

[27]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  Design of Graph-Based Evolutionary Algorithms: A Case Study for Chemical Process Networks , 2001, Evolutionary Computation.

[28]  Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt,et al.  Optimization techniques to improve energy efficiency in power systems , 2011 .

[29]  Jonathan A. Wright,et al.  Evolutionary Synthesis of HVAC System Configurations: Experimental Results , 2008 .

[30]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  Introduction to Evolutionary Computing , 2003, Natural Computing Series.

[31]  Arthur Westerberg,et al.  A retrospective on design and process synthesis , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[32]  Z. Kravanja,et al.  Suitable Modeling for Process Flow Sheet Optimization Using the Correct Economic Criterion , 2011 .

[33]  Zdravko Kravanja,et al.  Challenges in sustainable integrated process synthesis and the capabilities of an MINLP process synthesizer MipSyn , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[34]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Retrospective on optimization , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[35]  Michael T. M. Emmerich Optimisation of Thermal Power Plant Designs: A Graph-based Adaptive Search Approach , 2002 .

[36]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  Engineered versus standard evolutionary algorithms: A case study in batch scheduling with recourse , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..