Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data

Investments in cyberinfrastructure and e-Science initiatives are motivated by the desire to accelerate scientific discovery. Always viewed as a foundation of science, data sharing is appropriately seen as critical to the success of such initiatives, but new technologies supporting increasingly data-intensive and collaborative science raise significant challenges and opportunities. Overcoming the technical and social challenges to broader data sharing is a common and important research objective, but increasing the supply and accessibility of scientific data is no guarantee data will be applied by scientists. Before reusing data created by others, scientists need to assess the data’s relevance, they seek confidence the data can be understood, and they must trust the data. Using interview data from earthquake engineering researchers affiliated with the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES), we examine how these scientists assess the reusability of colleagues’ experimental data for model validation.

[1]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Advances in environmental information management , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[2]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[3]  Andrew C. Simpson,et al.  Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[4]  N. House Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information , 2002 .

[5]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Digital Data Practices and the Long Term Ecological Research Program Growing Global , 2008, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[6]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  Managing Rapidly-Evolving Scientific Workflows , 2006, IPAW.

[7]  Ben Anderson,et al.  What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[9]  William K. Michener,et al.  Meta-information concepts for ecological data management , 2006, Ecol. Informatics.

[10]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[11]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  Querying and re-using workflows with VsTrails , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[12]  Ixchel M. Faniel Unrealized Potential: The Socio-Technical Challenges of a Large Scale Cyberinfrastructure Initiative , 2009 .

[13]  Juliana Freire,et al.  Provenance and scientific workflows: challenges and opportunities , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[14]  L. Stewart User Acceptance of Electronic Journals: Interviews with Chemists at Cornell University , 1996 .

[15]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Finding and using journal-article components: Impacts of disaggregation on teaching and research practice , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  The Special Case of Scientific Data Sharing with Education , 2006, ASIST.

[17]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Barriers to the Adoption of New Collaboration Technologies for Scientists , 2009 .

[18]  Nithya Ramanathan,et al.  Know Thy Sensor: Trust, Data Quality, and Data Integrity in Scientific Digital Libraries , 2007, ECDL.

[19]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[20]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[21]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: sharing environmental planning data sets , 1998, CSCW '98.

[22]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  myExperiment: Defining the Social Virtual Research Environment , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.

[23]  Lynn Yarmey,et al.  Data Stewardship: Environmental Data Curation and a Web-of-Repositories , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[24]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Document Structure and Digital Libraries: How Researchers Mobilize Information in Journal Articles , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Figure and table retrieval from scholarly journal articles: User needs for teaching and research , 2007, ASIST.

[26]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  New Knowledge from Old Data , 2008 .

[27]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Will a Biological Database Be Different from a Biological Journal? , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  S. Ross :Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2009 .