Ambient Noise Tomography With Common Receiver Clusters in Distributed Sensor Networks

Near-surface imaging with distributed sensor networks (DSN) is promising for planet exploration, which affordably generates a near-surface velocity model. Recently, an Eikonal tomography-based ambient noise seismic imaging (ANSI) algorithm was implemented in a DSN to realize real-time and in-situ near-surface imaging. However, only using data from neighbors to generate a velocity map cannot have enough stacking samples to generate high-quality results. Also, the neighbor range increase will result in the exponential rise of communication costs. To overcome this problem, we propose a new decentralized Eikonal tomography algorithm in the DSN. The main idea is to change the source-based algorithm to a receiver-based one, which we call common receiver decentralized Eikonal tomography (CR-TomoEK). With CR-TomoEK, nodes fully utilize signals from neighbors to generate partial velocity maps, when combined, lead to the final output. When compared with the original Eikonal algorithm, the stacking number is significantly increased, output quality is higher than before, and there is a significant reduction in communication cost. We performed experiments on both synthetic data and real data from the USArray Transportable Array. Both imaging quality and communication cost are considered in the algorithm validation. The result shows that our algorithm significantly increases the output quality while keeping the communication cost safe to generate a real-time result.

[1]  Robert T. Pappalardo,et al.  Europa Clipper Mission Concept: Exploring Jupiter's Ocean Moon , 2014 .

[2]  Jose Clemente,et al.  Distributed and Communication-Efficient Spatial Auto-Correlation Subsurface Imaging in Sensor Networks , 2019, Sensors.

[3]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  1‐D, 2‐D, and 3‐D Monte Carlo Ambient Noise Tomography Using a Dense Passive Seismic Array Installed on the North Sea Seabed , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[4]  Goutham Kamath,et al.  Real-Time Ambient Noise Subsurface Imaging in Distributed Sensor Networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP).

[5]  Fabian Ernst,et al.  Surface wave eikonal tomography in heterogeneous media using exploration data , 2012 .

[6]  Fangyu Li,et al.  Waveform Inversion-Assisted Distributed Reverse Time Migration for Microseismic Location , 2019, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Richard Lynch,et al.  Body-wave reconstruction from ambient seismic noise correlations in an underground mine , 2015 .

[8]  Michael H. Ritzwoller,et al.  Ambient noise surface wave tomography of the Iberian Peninsula: Implications for shallow seismic structure , 2007 .

[9]  Wen-Zhan Song,et al.  Smart seismic network for shallow subsurface imaging and infrastructure security , 2019 .

[10]  Lanbo Liu,et al.  Ambient noise as the new source for urban engineering seismology and earthquake engineering: a case study from Beijing metropolitan area , 2014 .

[11]  Gaurav Tomar,et al.  Joint inversion of the first overtone and fundamental mode for deep imaging at the Valhall oil field using ambient noise , 2018 .

[12]  Fangyu Li,et al.  Real-Time Cooperative Analytics for Ambient Noise Tomography in Sensor Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks.

[13]  Sharon Kedar,et al.  Planetary Subsurface Exploration with Smart Seismic Networks , 2018 .

[14]  Michel Campillo,et al.  3‐D surface wave tomography of the Piton de la Fournaise volcano using seismic noise correlations , 2007 .

[15]  Robert S. White,et al.  Ambient noise tomography reveals upper crustal structure of Icelandic rifts , 2017 .

[16]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Toward Creating a Subsurface Camera , 2018, Sensors.

[17]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Planned Products of the Mars Structure Service for the InSight Mission to Mars , 2017 .

[18]  Robert W. Clayton,et al.  High-resolution 3D shallow crustal structure in Long Beach, California: Application of ambient noise tomography on a dense seismic array , 2013 .

[19]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Seismic gradiometry using ambient seismic noise in an anisotropic Earth , 2017 .

[20]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Eikonal tomography: surface wave tomography by phase front tracking across a regional broad‐band seismic array , 2009 .

[21]  Göran Ekström,et al.  Determination of surface‐wave phase velocities across USArray from noise and Aki's spectral formulation , 2009 .

[22]  Malcolm Sambridge,et al.  New insight into Cainozoic sedimentary basins and Palaeozoic suture zones in southeast Australia from ambient noise surface wave tomography , 2010 .

[23]  Jianping Wu,et al.  High resolution Rayleigh wave group velocity tomography in North China from ambient seismic noise , 2010 .

[24]  Weili Wu,et al.  A greedy approximation for minimum connected dominating sets , 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[25]  Weili Wu,et al.  Minimum connected dominating sets and maximal independent sets in unit disk graphs , 2006, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[26]  Joe Dellinger,et al.  Ambient seismic noise eikonal tomography for near-surface imaging at Valhall , 2011 .

[27]  Morgan P. Moschetti,et al.  Surface wave tomography of the western United States from ambient seismic noise: Rayleigh and Love wave phase velocity maps , 2008 .

[28]  Chen Yong A new method for seismic imaging from ambient seismic noise , 2007 .

[29]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  Green's function representations for seismic interferometry , 2006 .

[30]  Michael H. Ritzwoller,et al.  Ambient noise tomography with a large seismic array , 2011 .