Evaluation of command algorithms for control of upper-extremity neural prostheses

Five new command control algorithms were created to enable increased control over grasp force in upper-extremity neural prostheses. Most of these algorithms took advantage of the ability to lock or assign a steady command value to the hand neural prosthesis. Five able-bodied subjects tested the algorithms by using a shoulder controller that controlled a video-simulated hand to repeatedly complete a consistent evaluation task. A generalized estimating equations-based linear model was used to analyze the data. The algorithms were ranked via contrast analyses between the coefficient values from the linear model of the proportional control with lock algorithm, which is the algorithm presently used in neural prostheses, and each of the other algorithms. The algorithms that allowed adjustment of the command value after the hand was locked as well as algorithms that allowed a decrease in controller gain after the hand was locked performed better than the proportional control with lock algorithm. Algorithms that changed command as a function of time performed worse than the proportional control with lock algorithm. Further, the computer-based video simulator proved to be useful as a first-pass evaluation tool for neural prosthesis control.

[1]  P H Peckham,et al.  EEG-based control of a hand grasp neuroprosthesis. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[2]  E. Marsolais,et al.  Restoration of key grip and release in the C6 tetraplegic patient through functional electrical stimulation. , 1980 .

[3]  P.E. Crago,et al.  Assessment of input-output properties and control of neuroprosthetic hand grasp , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  W K Durfee,et al.  Simulator for evaluating shoulder motion as a command source for FES grasp restoration systems. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  P H Peckham,et al.  A comparison between control methods for implanted FES hand-grasp systems. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  T R Scott,et al.  Tri-state myoelectric control of bilateral upper extremity neuroprostheses for tetraplegic individuals. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Dynamic control of sliding by robot hands for regrasping , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  E. L. Morin,et al.  A myoelectric control evaluation and trainer system , 1994 .

[9]  M M Adamczyk,et al.  Input-output nonlinearities and time delays increase tracking errors in hand grasp neuroprostheses. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[11]  G E Loeb,et al.  Neural signals for command control and feedback in functional neuromuscular stimulation: a review. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  S. Pourmehdi,et al.  An externally powered, multichannel, implantable stimulator-telemeter for control of paralyzed muscle , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  P. Peckham,et al.  Evaluation of shoulder movement as a command control source , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[15]  P. E. Crago,et al.  Instrumented assessment of FNS hand control during specific manipulation tasks , 1994 .