Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure

Sentence processing in American Sign Language (ASL) was investigated as a function of age of first language acquisition with a timed grammatical judgement task. Participants were 30 adults who were born deaf and first exposed to a fully perceptible language between the ages of birth and 13 years. Stimuli were grammatical and ungrammatical examples of six ASL syntactic structures: simple, negative, agreement verb, wh-question, relative clause and classifier sentences. As delay in exposure to a first language increased, grammatical judgement accuracy decreased, independent of ASL syntactic structure. The signers were less accurate and responded more slowly to ungrammatical as compared with grammatical stimuli, especially the early and delayed first-language learners in comparison to the native learners. The results held across grammaticised facial expressions, signed markers and verb type. These results, in conjunction with previous findings, indicate that the onset of first language acquisition affects the ultimate outcome of syntactic knowledge for all subsequent language acquisition.

[1]  R. Mayberry.  Cognitive development in deaf children: the interface of language and perception in neuropsychology , 2002 .

[2]  Judy Reilly,et al.  The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Normative Data for American Sign Language. , 2002, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[3]  David P Corina,et al.  Recognition of affective and noncanonical linguistic facial expressions in hearing and deaf subjects , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  G. Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Age Constraints on Second-Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[5]  Diane C. Lillo-Martin,et al.  WH-MOVEMENT AND THE POSITION OF SPEC-CP : EVIDENCE FROM AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1997 .

[6]  S. Curtiss.  Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day "Wild Child" , 1977 .

[7]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures , 1998, Nature.

[8]  E. Klima.  The signs of language , 1979 .

[9]  R. L. Rosnow,et al.  Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  Diane E. Anderson,et al.  The puzzle of negation: How children move from communicative to grammatical negation in ASL , 1997, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[11]  Carol Padden,et al.  Some Arguments for Syntactic Patterning in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[12]  S D Fischer,et al.  Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The Resilience of Language , 2005 .

[14]  Deborah Chen Pichler,et al.  Word order variation and acquisition in American Sign Language , 2002 .

[15]  Richard P. Meier,et al.  Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: Iconically or morphologically determined? , 1987 .

[16]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[17]  D. Corina,et al.  Phonological similarity in American Sign Language , 2002 .

[18]  U. Bellugi,et al.  The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language: Grammaticized facial expressions , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[19]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[20]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition , 2001 .

[21]  R. Mayberry,et al.  First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: the case of American Sign Language. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  R. Mayberry,et al.  Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: Evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis , 2003, Brain and Language.

[23]  Rachel I. Mayberry,et al.  The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition , 1991 .

[24]  L. Wallin,et al.  Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language , 1996 .

[25]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical Period Effects in Second Language Acquisition: The Effect of Written versus Auditory Materials on the Assessment of Grammatical Competence† , 1992 .

[26]  U Bellugi,et al.  Competition on the face: affect and language in ASL motherese , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  R. Battison,et al.  Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language , 1978 .

[28]  Rachel I. Mayberry,et al.  Sign language acquisition , 2006 .

[29]  R. Mayberry,et al.  Development: Linguistic ability and early language exposure , 2002, Nature.

[30]  Carol Neidle,et al.  The Rightward Analysis of WH-Movement in ASL: A Reply to Petronio and Lillo-Martin. , 1998 .

[31]  Peter M. Duppenthaler.  Maturational Constraints on Language Learning , 1990 .

[32]  Jerome D. Schein,et al.  THE DEAF POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES , 1974 .

[33]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[34]  Scott K. Liddell.  American Sign Language Syntax , 1981 .

[35]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Daniel O. Jackson,et al.  Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis , 2000 .

[37]  Jill P. Morford,et al.  Grammatical development in adolescent first-language learners , 2003 .

[38]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages , 2003 .