Analysis of Peer Interaction in Learning Activities with Personal Handhelds and Shared Displays

Collaborative learning is extensively applied in classroom activities, but the screens on handheld devices are designed for individual-user mobile applications and may constrain interaction among group learners. The small screen size may lead to fragmented and tete-a-tete communication patterns and frequently obstruct the externalization of the learning process. This study compares two learning scenarios, one using only handheld devices and the other integrating handheld devices with LCD shared displays, in order to explore whether shared displays in classrooms can augment handheld devices to facilitate articulation and communication among participants. This study involved 15 graduate students enrolled in a Statistics and Data Mining course. Data were collected on the course over a period of eight weeks. Students were required to solve problems collaboratively and content analysis was performed on student dialogue and nonverbal interactions in the two different learning scenarios. In the environment with shared displays, each discussion thread attracted more students and demonstrated more shared visual focus than in the one-to-one setting by a significant margin. Students, when studying in an environment with shared displays, exhibited more lively interaction with each other, including frequent hand-pointing behavior. Furthermore, students proposed more arguments and positions in the SharedDisplay environment than in the environment without shared displays. Therefore, shared displays can not only improve articulation processes, but can also promote student engagement by establishing a social workspace for learning with handheld devices.

[1]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[2]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum , 2001 .

[3]  C.-C. Wu,et al.  Using handhelds in a Jigsaw cooperative learning environment , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning Experiences for Hard of Hearing Students With Wireless Technology-Enhanced Classrooms , 2006, American annals of the deaf.

[6]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Collaborative Knowledge Construction through Shared Representations , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  E. Soloway,et al.  Learning With Peers: From Small Group Cooperation to Collaborative Communities , 1996 .

[8]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Knowledge acquisition as a constructive modeling activity , 1993, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[10]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  Bridging the gap between students and computers: supporting activity awareness for network collaborative learning with GSM network , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[12]  S. Murthy,et al.  Less is more… (more or less…). , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  From activity to gestures and scientific language , 2001 .

[14]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[15]  Frederick William Milson,et al.  An introduction to group work skill , 1973 .

[16]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[17]  David W. Johnson The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School , 1994 .

[18]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Awareness support in a groupware widget toolkit , 2003, GROUP.

[20]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Sharing Solutions: Persistence and Grounding in Multimodal Collaborative Problem Solving , 2006 .

[21]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[22]  Glenn J. Browne,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of User Requirements Elicitation: Comparing the Effectiveness of Prompting Techniques , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Anna Klerfelt,et al.  Gestures in conversation - the significance of gestures and utterances when children and preschool teachers create stories using the computer , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Using Disortion-Oriented Displays to Support Workspace Awareness , 1996, BCS HCI.

[25]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[26]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  Do handheld devices facilitate face-to-face collaboration? Handheld devices with large shared display groupware to facilitate group interactions , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  Kibum Kim,et al.  Handheld-Mediated Communication to Support the Effective Sharing of Meaning in Joint Activity , 2006, 2006 Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMTE'06).

[28]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[29]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[30]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Understanding children's interactions in synchronous shared environments , 2002, CSCL.

[31]  R. Säljö Lärande i praktiken : ett sociokulturellt perspektiv , 2005 .