Binocular Balance in Normal Vision and Its Modulation by Mean Luminance

Purpose. To better understand the neural basis of sensory dominance in the normal population, we applied a recently established test designed to quantify the degree of suppression in amblyopia to participants with normal binocular vision. Methods. This test quantifies the degree of dichoptic imbalance in coherent motion sensitivity by manipulating the contrast of stimuli seen by the two eyes. The contrast at which balanced dichoptic motion sensitivity occurs is referred to as the “balance point” and is an estimate of the degree of suppression. We apply the same logic to the measurement of sensory dominance by measuring the distribution of “balance points” within the normal population. Results. We show that although most subjects are balanced or only weakly imbalanced, a minority is strongly imbalanced. To ascertain the site of sensory dominance, we assessed the degree to which normal sensory balance can be modulated by changing the interocular mean luminance. We found that mismatches in mean luminance between the two eyes had a pronounced effect on the balance point determination. Conclusions. Because cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus exhibit a strong modulation to sustained changes in the mean light level, this may suggests that the inhibitory circuits underlying sensory eye dominance are located at a precortical site.

[1]  Robert F Hess,et al.  A Compact Clinical Instrument for Quantifying Suppression , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Quantifying sensory eye dominance in the normal visual system: a new technique and insights into variation across traditional tests. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  A Binocular Approach to Treating Amblyopia: Antisuppression Therapy , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  R. Hess,et al.  The roles of contrast and luminance in amblyopic suppression , 2010 .

[5]  R. Blake,et al.  A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  R F Hess,et al.  A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. , 2010, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[7]  Jack Alexander,et al.  Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity , 2009, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[8]  B. Mansouri,et al.  Measurement of suprathreshold binocular interactions in amblyopia , 2008, Vision Research.

[9]  Bruce J W Evans,et al.  Monovision: a review , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  Elena Piedrahita,et al.  Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex to Transient Changes in Local Contrast and Luminance , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[13]  R. Hess,et al.  Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[14]  Shama C. Akhtar,et al.  The contribution of 3-D object height and density to altitude maintenance in low-altitude flight , 2004 .

[15]  Hiroshi Uozato,et al.  Effects of Dominant and Nondominant Eyes in Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Hiroshi Uozato,et al.  Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  R. Freeman,et al.  Binocular interaction in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  R. Freeman,et al.  Effects of strabismus on development of cortico-geniculate projections in the kitten , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Visual suppression from nondominant eye in the lateral geniculate nucleus: A comparison of cat and monkey , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  K. Sanderson,et al.  The properties of the binocular receptive fields of lateral geniculate neurons , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  U. Eysel,et al.  Binocular interactions in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: GABAergic inhibition reduced by dominant afferent activity , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Michael Bach,et al.  Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance , 2003, Vision Research.

[23]  K. Miller,et al.  LGN input to simple cells and contrast-invariant orientation tuning: an analysis. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Kapadia,et al.  Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[26]  S. Jain,et al.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. , 1996, Survey of ophthalmology.

[27]  C. E. Schroeder,et al.  Binocularity in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the alert macaque , 1990, Brain Research.

[28]  P Erickson,et al.  Patterns of Binocular Suppression and Accommodation in Monovision , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[29]  R. Freeman,et al.  An electrophysiological comparison of convergent and divergent strabismus in the cat: electrical and visual activation of single cortical cells. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  T. Tsumoto Inhibitory and excitatory binocular convergence to visual cortical neurons of the cat , 1978, Brain Research.

[31]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[32]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[33]  P O Bishop,et al.  Binocular corresponding receptive fields of single units in the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1969, Vision research.