Numerical Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed PLA Scaffold

This study aims to determine the dimensional accuracy and porosity of polylactic acid scaffold using 3D printing and the value of the effective elastic modulus. The main contribution of this research is to obtain the most suitable scaffold porosity for use as cancellous bone implants. It was obtained by comparing the dimensions and porosity of the printed scaffold with the CAD model and its effective modulus of elasticity with the cancellous bone. The 3D printing machine makes four scaffolds with varying porosity and one scaffold with 0% porosity. Scaffold dimensions were measured using a caliper. Measuring the volume of solids using a measuring cup and ethanol gives a porosity value, while as a benchmark for the total volume of the scaffold using 0% porosity. Computer simulation with MSC Marc software produces the effective modulus of elasticity. Scaffold with porosity variants of 42.9% and 58.1% showed that the results of the printed scaffold were perfect, while the porosity of 22.3% and 73.4% gave wrong impressions because they had too small pores or features. On the other hand, scaffolds with porosity of 58.1% and 73.4% had adequate elastic modulus corresponding to the span of cancellous bone. It was concluded that the porosity of the 58.1% scaffold was the best for use as a cancellous bone implant with accurate fabrication results.

[1]  José Miranda Guedes,et al.  On the Tortuosity of TPMS Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2020, Symmetry.

[2]  R. Ambu,et al.  Modeling, Assessment, and Design of Porous Cells Based on Schwartz Primitive Surface for Bone Scaffolds , 2019, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[3]  Davar Ali,et al.  Effect of scaffold architecture on cell seeding efficiency: A discrete phase model CFD analysis , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[4]  D. Rosenzweig,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printed Polylactic Acid Scaffolds Promote Bone-like Matrix Deposition in Vitro. , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[5]  I. S. Torubarov,et al.  Investigation of Kinematics of 3D Printer Print Head Moving Systems , 2019, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[6]  Shuping Peng,et al.  Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds , 2018, International journal of bioprinting.

[7]  C. Dupont-Gillain,et al.  3D-printed biodegradable gyroid scaffolds for tissue engineering applications , 2018, Materials & Design.

[8]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Anisotropic mechanical property variance between ASTM D638-14 type i and type iv fused filament fabricated specimens , 2018, Polymer Testing.

[9]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Effects of bone substitute architecture and surface properties on cell response, angiogenesis, and structure of new bone. , 2017, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[10]  J. Fages,et al.  Extrusion assisted by supercritical CO2 : a review on its application to biopolymers , 2017 .

[11]  Qing Li,et al.  Yielding behaviors of polymeric scaffolds with implications to tissue engineering , 2016 .

[12]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  A model of the mechanical degradation of foam replicated scaffolds , 2016, Journal of Materials Science.

[13]  M. Taha,et al.  Thermosensitive polylactic-acid-based networks , 2015 .

[14]  C. Lim,et al.  Study on structural and mechanical properties of porous PLA nanofibers electrospun by channel-based electrospinning system , 2015 .

[15]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  B. Hur,et al.  Effects of porosity and pore size on the compressive properties of closed-cell Mg alloy foam , 2013 .

[17]  J. Milan,et al.  Computational modelling of the mechanical environment of osteogenesis within a polylactic acid-calcium phosphate glass scaffold. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[18]  Li Li,et al.  A review on biodegradable polymeric materials for bone tissue engineering applications , 2009 .

[19]  Jeroen Rouwkema,et al.  Vascularization in tissue engineering. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[20]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Polymer scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled architecture for tissue engineering: fabrication, mechanical properties, and finite element modeling. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[22]  Satoru Goto,et al.  Accurate Control Position of Belt Drives under Acceleration and Velocity Constraints , 2003 .

[23]  M Dujovny,et al.  Biomechanical properties of calvarium prosthesis , 2001, Neurological research.

[24]  J. Lewis,et al.  Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis. , 1982, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  S. Bhandari,et al.  Characterization methods , 2020, Fiber-Reinforced Nanocomposites: Fundamentals and Applications.

[26]  Todo Mitsugu,et al.  Development and Characterization of Gear Shape Porous Scaffolds Using 3D Printing Technology , 2017 .

[27]  byBrooke LaBranche,et al.  3 D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2017 .

[28]  J. Ramirez-Vick,et al.  Scaffold design for bone regeneration. , 2014, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[29]  S. Sethuraman,et al.  Biomedical Applications of Nondegradable Polymers , 2014 .