Students' Coordination of Knowledge When Learning to Model Physical Situations

In this article, I present a study in which 12 pairs of 8th-grade students solved problems about a physical device with algebra. The device, called a winch, instantiates motions that can be modeled by pairs of simultaneous linear functions. The following question motivated the study: How can students generate algebraic models without direct instruction from more experienced others? The first main result of the study is that students have and can use criteria for judging when 1 algebraic expression is better than another. Thus, students can use criteria to regulate their problem-solving activity. The second main result is that constructing knowledge for modeling with algebra can require students to coordinate criteria for algebraic representations with several other types of knowledge that I also identify in the article. These results contribute to research on students' algebraic modeling, cognitive processes and knowledge structures for using mathematical representations, and the development of mathematical knowledge.

[1]  Jill H. Larkin Robust performance in algebra: The role of the problem representation. , 1989 .

[2]  Jere Confrey,et al.  The Development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics , 1995 .

[3]  Christian R Hirsch,et al.  Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A Unified Approach. Implementing the Core-Plus Mathematics Curriculum. , 1998 .

[4]  Anna Sfard,et al.  Steering (Dis)Course between Metaphors and Rigor: Using Focal Analysis to Investigate an Emergence of Mathematical Objects , 2000 .

[5]  Merlyn J. Behr,et al.  Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving , 1987 .

[6]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[7]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[8]  Judit N. Moschkovich,et al.  Resources for Refining Mathematical Conceptions: Case Studies in Learning About Linear Functions , 1998 .

[9]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  T. Kieren,et al.  Watching Sandy's Understanding Grow. , 1992 .

[11]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Students’ Criteria for Representational Adequacy , 2002 .

[12]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Mathematics Education: Models and Processes , 1995 .

[13]  Andrew Izsák,et al.  "We Want a Statement That Is Always True": Criteria for Good Algebraic Representations and the Development of Modeling Knowledge , 2003 .

[14]  Merlyn J. Behr,et al.  Number concepts and operations in the middle grades , 1988 .

[15]  D. Kibler,et al.  Exploring the Episodic Structure of Algebra Story Problem Solving , 1989 .

[16]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[17]  Robbie Case,et al.  Intellectual development : birth to adulthood , 1985 .

[18]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  A new hypothesis concerning children’s fractional knowledge ☆ , 2001 .

[19]  K. Hart,et al.  Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16 , 1981 .

[20]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking , 2002 .

[21]  Rogers Hall,et al.  Making mathematics on paper: constructing representations of stories about related linear functions , 1990 .

[22]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Construction of Arithmetical Meanings and Strategies , 1987 .

[23]  John J. Clement,et al.  The Concept of Variation and Misconceptions in Cartesian Graphing. , 1989 .

[24]  Andrew Izsak,et al.  Inscribing the Winch: Mechanisms by Which Students Develop Knowledge Structures for Representing the Physical World With Algebra , 2000 .

[25]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[26]  Eon Harper Ghosts of diophantus , 1987 .

[27]  Tommy Dreyfus,et al.  Advanced Mathematical Thinking Processes , 2002 .

[28]  Ellen Hines Developing the concept of linear function: one student’s experiences with dynamic physical models , 2001 .

[29]  David Harris Russell,et al.  Children's thinking , 1956 .

[30]  Arthur F. Coxford,et al.  Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A Unified Approach , 1998 .

[31]  Louis A. Penner,et al.  The Challenge in mathematics and science education : psychology's response , 1993 .

[32]  P. Cobb,et al.  Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. , 1996 .

[33]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Two Forces in the Development of Relational Similarity , 2002 .

[34]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy [MAA Notes, Volume 25] , 1992 .

[35]  Luciano Meira,et al.  The Microevolution of Mathematical Representations in Children's Activity , 1995 .

[36]  Hugh Lehman,et al.  On Understanding Mathematics. , 1977 .

[37]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[38]  Bruce L Sherin,et al.  How Students Understand Physics Equations , 2001 .

[39]  Eric A. Jenkins,et al.  How Children Discover New Strategies , 1989 .

[40]  Draga Vidakovic,et al.  Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme , 1996 .

[41]  John Olive,et al.  From Fractions to Rational Numbers of Arithmetic: A Reorganization Hypothesis. , 1999 .

[42]  Susan E. B. Pirie,et al.  A Recursive Theory of Mathematical Understanding. , 1989 .

[43]  Uri Leron,et al.  On learning fundamental concepts of group theory , 1994 .

[45]  Carolyn Kieran The learning and teaching of school algebra. , 1992 .

[46]  Lesley R. Booth Child-methods in secondary mathematics , 1981 .

[47]  Luciano Meira,et al.  Making Sense of Instructional Devices: The Emergence of Transparency in Mathematical Activity. , 1998 .

[48]  Kathleen Hart,et al.  Children's Understanding of Mathematics , 1989 .

[49]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate , 1994 .

[50]  Andra A. DiSessa Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[51]  John J. Clement,et al.  Algebra Word Problem Solutions: Thought Processes Underlying a Common Misconception , 1982 .

[52]  R. Siegler Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking , 1996 .

[53]  A. Sfard,et al.  The gains and the pitfalls of reification — The case of algebra , 1994 .

[54]  Mikhail V. Matz A process model for high school algebra errors , 1982 .

[55]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Epistemology and Psychology of Functions , 1977 .

[56]  Helen M. Doerr,et al.  Understanding How Students Develop Mathematical Models , 1999 .

[57]  J. Kaput Notations and Representations as Mediators of Constructive Processes , 1991 .

[58]  James G. Greeno,et al.  For research to reform education and cognitive science. , 1993 .

[59]  C. Hirsch Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[60]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching , 1990 .

[61]  P. M. Hiele Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education , 1985 .

[62]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  A New Hypothesis Concerning Children ’ s Fractional Knowledge , 2002 .

[63]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  Development of the process conception of function , 1992 .

[64]  Ricardo Nemirovsky On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and the velocity sign , 1994 .

[65]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Modeling the development of reasoning strategies: The roles of analogy, knowledge, and capacity , 1995 .

[66]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  Modeling cognitive development with a generative connectionist algorithm , 1995 .