Propulsive performance of three naturally occurring oscillating propeller planforms

Abstract A numerical method, the quasi-vortex-lattice method (QVLM), was applied to predict the propulsive performance of three naturally occurring oscillating propellers. These were cetacean flukes for a fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus); white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus acutus); and white whale (Delphinapterus leucas). The fin whale's flukes had the highest aspect ratio (6.1) and moderate sweep angle (31°); the white-sided dolphin's flukes had the highest sweep angle (47°) and lowest aspect ratio (2.7); and the white whale's flukes had moderate aspect ratio (3.3) and the lowest sweep angle (28°). In the numerical simulations, the planforms were assumed to be rigid both in chordwise and spanwise directions, and to be oscillating harmonically in an irrotational, incompressible fluid. Calculation and comparisons of propulsive efficiency and thrust coefficient vs advance ratio for each of the planforms were made in three cases: varied heave amplitude; different pitching axis positions; and varied angular amplitude of pitch.

[1]  Neil Bose,et al.  Measurements of the bodies and flukes of several cetacean species , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Sheila E. Widnall,et al.  Energetics and optimum motion of oscillating lifting surfaces of finite span , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  C. E. Lan,et al.  On the logarithmic-singularity correction in the kernel function method of subsonic lifting-surface theory , 1977 .

[4]  Pengfei Liu,et al.  Three dimensional oscillating foil propulsion , 1991 .

[5]  P. Wilmott,et al.  Unsteady lifting-line theory by the method of matched asymptotic expansions , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Jon Lien,et al.  Propulsion of a fin whale ( Balenoptera physalus) : why the fin whale is a fast swimmer , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  Geoffrey Spedding,et al.  Lunate-tail swimming propulsion. Part 2. Performance analysis , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  H. Multhopp Methods for Calculating the Lift Distribution of Wings (Subsonic Lifting-Surface Theory). , 1950 .

[9]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[10]  M. Chopra,et al.  Hydromechanics of lunate-tail swimming propulsion , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  van Manen Non-conventional propulsion devices , 1973 .

[12]  D. E. Davies Calculation of unsteady generalised airforces on a thin wing oscillating harmonically in subsonic flow , 1963 .

[13]  M. Lighthill Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  T. Kambe,et al.  Hydromechanics of lunate-tail swimming propulsion. Part 2 , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  C. E. Lan,et al.  The unsteady quasi-vortex-lattice method with applications to animal propulsion , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Jean-Luc Guermond,et al.  A unified unsteady lifting-line theory , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  M. Lighthill Hydromechanics of Aquatic Animal Propulsion , 1969 .

[18]  C. E. Lan,et al.  A Quasi-Vortex-Lattice Method in Thin Wing Theory , 1974 .