Mobile WiMAX for vehicular applications: Performance evaluation and comparison against IEEE 802.11p/a

Vehicular communications have received a lot of attention in recent years due to the demand for applications to improve safety and travel comfort. Nowadays, IEEE 802.11p seems to be the best positioned standard for providing safety services. However, for non-safety services, which usually do not present tight time restrictions but require high data transfer rates, other wireless communication standards such as IEEE 802.16e (Mobile WiMAX) may exhibit better performance. In order to shed light on this question, we developed the physical (PHY) layer of a Mobile WiMAX software transceiver and measured its performance using a channel emulator implemented on an FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) that recreates six different vehicular scenarios, including a highway, urban canyons and a suburban area. Furthermore, we have compared such performance with those obtained with IEEE 802.11p and IEEE 802.11a standards, concluding that, in most of the vehicular scenarios considered, the PHY-layer of Mobile WiMAX exhibits a superior performance. The performance results presented herein can also be used as the input for network simulators to carry out more accurate system-level simulations that should help in making a final decision on which standard should be used in each specific vehicular network.

[1]  Mineo Takai,et al.  Effects of wireless physical layer modeling in mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[2]  Kostas Pentikousis,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Mobile WiMAX with MIMO , 2009, 2009 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[3]  Babak Daneshrad,et al.  Detailed OFDM modeling in network simulation of mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, 18th Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation, 2004. PADS 2004..

[4]  Connie Ribeiro Bringing Wireless Access to the Automobile : A Comparison of , 2005 .

[5]  Geert Leus,et al.  Simple equalization of time-varying channels for OFDM , 2005, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Mary Ann Ingram,et al.  Six Time- and Frequency-Selective Empirical Channel Models for Vehicular Wireless LANs , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[7]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Channel Modeling for V2V Communications , 2006, 2006 Third Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services.

[8]  IEEE Wireless Communications , 2004, IEEE wireless communications.

[9]  Tewfik L. Doumi Spectrum considerations for public safety in the United States , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  D. Habibi,et al.  An Improved FEC Scheme for Mobile Wireless Communication at Vehicular Speeds , 2008, 2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference.

[11]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  IEEE 802.20: mobile broadband wireless access , 2007, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[12]  Angela Doufexi,et al.  Mobile WiMAX: Performance Analysis and Comparison with Experimental Results , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[13]  Boon-Chong Seet,et al.  Evaluation of terrain effects on mobile WiMax in a vehicular environment , 2008, 2008 8th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.

[14]  Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés,et al.  FPGA-Based Vehicular Channel Emulator for Real-Time Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11p Transceivers , 2010, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[15]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Performance Evaluation of 802.16e in Vehicle to Vehicle Channels , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[16]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  Performance measurement over Mobile WiMAX/IEEE 802.16e network , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[17]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11-based WLANs in Vehicular Scenarios , 2007, 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring.

[18]  Todor Cooklev,et al.  Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems , 2004 .

[19]  Fan Bai,et al.  A Measurement Study of Time-Scaled 802.11a Waveforms Over The Mobile-to-Mobile Vehicular Channel at 5.9 GHz , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.