How to conduct a proper sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: taking into account correlations within LCI data and interactions within the LCA calculation model.

Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a significant tool for studying the robustness of results and their sensitivity to uncertainty factors in life cycle assessment (LCA). It highlights the most important set of model parameters to determine whether data quality needs to be improved, and to enhance interpretation of results. Interactions within the LCA calculation model and correlations within Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) input parameters are two main issues among the LCA calculation process. Here we propose a methodology for conducting a proper SA which takes into account the effects of these two issues. This study first presents the SA in an uncorrelated case, comparing local and independent global sensitivity analysis. Independent global sensitivity analysis aims to analyze the variability of results because of the variation of input parameters over the whole domain of uncertainty, together with interactions among input parameters. We then apply a dependent global sensitivity approach that makes minor modifications to traditional Sobol indices to address the correlation issue. Finally, we propose some guidelines for choosing the appropriate SA method depending on the characteristics of the model and the goals of the study. Our results clearly show that the choice of sensitivity methods should be made according to the magnitude of uncertainty and the degree of correlation.

[1]  Robert Ries,et al.  Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches , 2007 .

[2]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant-Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (9 pp + 3 pp) , 2005 .

[3]  Shinsuke Sakai,et al.  Formulation of sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment using a perturbation method , 2002 .

[4]  P. Padey,et al.  From LCAs to simplified models: a generic methodology applied to wind power electricity. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[6]  Karl Pearson,et al.  ON A NEW METHOD OF DETERMINING CORRELATION BETWEEN A MEASURED CHARACTER A, AND A CHARACTER B, OF WHICH ONLY THE PERCENTAGE OF CASES WHEREIN B EXCEEDS (OR FALLS SHORT OF) A GIVEN INTENSITY IS RECORDED FOR EACH GRADE OF A , 1909 .

[7]  Guido Sonnemann,et al.  Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator , 2003 .

[8]  H. Hotelling Relations Between Two Sets of Variates , 1936 .

[9]  R. Heijungs Sensitivity coefficients for matrix-based LCA , 2010 .

[10]  David J. Brennan,et al.  Application of data quality assessment methods to an LCA of electricity generation , 2003 .

[11]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products , 1994 .

[12]  Remi B. Coulon,et al.  Data quality and uncertainty in LCI , 1997 .

[13]  Jonathan S. Skinner,et al.  Risky Income, Life Cycle Consumption, and Precautionary Savings , 1987 .

[14]  Fredrick Esscher On a method of determining correlation from the ranks of the variates , 1924 .

[15]  R. Kleijn,et al.  Numerical approaches towards life cycle interpretation five examples , 2001 .

[16]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[17]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Emission factor estimation for oil and gas facilities , 2011 .

[18]  Julien Jacques,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated inputs , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[20]  P. Games Correlation and Causation: A Logical Snafu , 1990 .

[21]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[22]  D. Makowski,et al.  Chapter 3 Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for crop models , 2006 .

[23]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[24]  Eddie Schrevens,et al.  Parameter uncertainty in LCA: stochastic sampling under correlation , 2010 .

[25]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[26]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products , 1992 .

[27]  C. Daniel One-at-a-Time Plans , 1973 .

[28]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[29]  T Sumner,et al.  A methodology for global-sensitivity analysis of time-dependent outputs in systems biology modelling , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  M. Castilla,et al.  The Influence of Agricultural Data Uncertainty in the Life Cycle Assessment of Biodegradable Hydraulic Lubricants , 2004 .

[31]  Gabriela Benveniste,et al.  Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best , 2010 .

[32]  Felix A. Miranda,et al.  Correlation of electric field and critical design parameters for ferroelectric tunable microwave filters , 1999 .

[33]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Two-step sensitivity testing of parametrized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.