The evolution of maladaptation

This review contains a description of a research program for the study of maladaptation, defined here in terms of deviation from adaptive peaks. Maladaptation has many genetic causes, including mutation, inbreeding, drift, gene flow, heterozygote advantage and pleiotropy. Degrees of maladaptation are determined by genetic architecture and the relationship between the rates of selective, environmental change and the nature and extent of genetic responses to selection. The empirical analysis of maladaptation requires: (1) recognition of putative maladaptation, using methods from phylogenetics, teleonomy, development and genetics, followed by an assessment of the nature and degree of deviation from adaptation, using studies of natural selection and teleonomy; (2) determination of the causes of the deviation, using analyses of genetics, development, or other methods. Conditions for unambiguously identifying maladaptation are considerably more stringent than those for demonstrating adaptation and remarkably few studies have clearly identified and characterised maladaptative traits. A thorough understanding of the nature of phenotypic variation will never be achieved without an analysis of the scope and usual causes of maladaptation.

[1]  M. Slatkin QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF HETEROCHRONY , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  D. Janzen,et al.  Neotropical Anachronisms: The Fruits the Gomphotheres Ate , 1982, Science.

[3]  G. Wilkinson Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae) , 1993 .

[4]  E. Herre,et al.  Optimality, plasticity and selective regime in fig wasp sex ratios , 1987, Nature.

[5]  M. Parker NONADAPTIVE EVOLUTION OF DISEASE RESISTANCE IN AN ANNUAL LEGUME , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  D. Baum,et al.  ADAPTATION REVIEWED: A PHYLOGENETIC METHODOLOGY FOR STUDYING CHARACTER MACROEVOLUTION , 1991 .

[7]  B. Crespi,et al.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GALL MORPHOLOGY IN AUSTRALIAN GALL THRIPS: THE EVOLUTION OF EXTENDED PHENOTYPES , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  Joe C. Campbell,et al.  Developmental Constraints and Evolution: A Perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on Development and Evolution , 1985, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[9]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  A. Clark,et al.  Senescence and the Genetic-Correlation Hang-Up , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[12]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  T. Price,et al.  The Adaptive Surface in Ecology , 1998 .

[14]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Nonadaptive clutch sizes in tits , 1990, Nature.

[15]  M. R. Rose,et al.  Three Approaches to Trade-Offs in Life-History Evolution , 1987 .

[16]  Hoffmann,et al.  Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  T. C. Kane,et al.  Vestigialization and Loss of Nonfunctional Characters , 1995 .

[18]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[19]  T. A. Langen,et al.  Evolution of correlated characters. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  D. Emlen,et al.  ARTIFICIAL SELECTION ON HORN LENGTH‐BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY IN THE HORNED BEETLE ONTHOPHAGUS ACUMINATUS (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  H. A. Orr,et al.  THE POPULATION GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE DISTRIBUTION OF FACTORS FIXED DURING ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  J. M. Smith What Determines the Rate of Evolution? , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[23]  B. Crespi Measuring the Effect of Natural Selection on Phenotypic Interaction Systems , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[24]  P. Alberch Developmental Constraints: Why St. Bernards Often Have an Extra Digit and Poodles Never Do , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[25]  A. Gray,et al.  I. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1963 .

[26]  V. Loeschcke Genetic Constraints on Adaptive Evolution , 1987, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[27]  N. Barton,et al.  Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. , 1990, Genetics.

[28]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[29]  George V. Lauder,et al.  What does the Comparative Method Reveal About Adaptation? , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[30]  J. Antonovics,et al.  Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Douglas W. Nychka,et al.  Exploring Fitness Surfaces , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[32]  P. Doughty Statistical Analysis of Natural Experiments in Evolutionary Biology: Comments on Recent Criticisms of the Use of Comparative Methods to Study Adaptation , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[33]  M. Turelli,et al.  CHANGES IN GENETIC VARIANCES AND COVARIANCES: G WHIZ! , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  D. Houle GENETIC COVARIANCE OF FITNESS CORRELATES: WHAT GENETIC CORRELATIONS ARE MADE OF AND WHY IT MATTERS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  T. C. Kane,et al.  LOSS OF NONFUNCTIONAL CHARACTERS , 1995 .

[36]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Optimality Models and the Test of Adaptationism , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[38]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  P. Sherman,et al.  Adaptation and the Goals of Evolutionary Research , 1993, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[40]  M. Sorenson,et al.  Phylogenetic constraint on male parental care in the dabbling ducks , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  J. Gillespie The causes of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[42]  S. J. Arnold Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[43]  R. Sibly,et al.  Constraints in the Evolution of Life Histories , 1991 .

[44]  P. Alberch,et al.  A DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS OF AN EVOLUTIONARY TREND: DIGITAL REDUCTION IN AMPHIBIANS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The Genetics of Adaptation: A Reassessment , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[46]  J. Levinton Developmental Constraints and Evolutionary Saltations: A Discussion and Critique , 1986 .

[47]  The Evolution of Behavioral Phenotypes: Lessons Learned from Divergent Spider Populations , 1993 .