EEG source estimation accuracy in presence of simulated cortical lesions

Methods to reconstruct the neuroelectrical activity in the brain source space can be used to improve the spatial resolution of scalp-recorded EEG and to estimate the locations of electrical sources in the brain. This procedure can improve the investigation of the functional organization of the human brain, exploiting the high temporal resolution of EEG to follow the temporal dynamics of information processing. As for today, the uncertainties about the effects of inhomogeneities due to brain lesions preclude the adoption of EEG functional mapping on patients with lesioned brain. The aim of this work is to quantify the accuracy of a distributed source localization method in recovering extended sources of activated cortex when cortical lesions of different dimensions are introduced in simulated data. For this purpose, EEG source-distributed activity estimated from real data was modified including silent lesion areas. Then, for each simulated lesion, forward and inverse calculations were carried out to localize the produced scalp activity and the reconstructed cortical activity. Finally, the error induced in the reconstruction by the presence of the lesion was computed and analyzed in relation to the number of electrodes and to the size of the simulated lesion. Results returned values of global error in the whole cortex and of error in the non-lesioned area which are strongly dependent on the number of recorded scalp sensors, as they increase when a lower spatial sampling is performed on the scalp (64 versus 32 EEG channels). For increasing spatial sampling frequencies, the accuracy of the source reconstruction improves and even the presence of small lesions induces significantly higher error levels with respect to the lesion-free condition.

[1]  T Musha,et al.  Effects of cavities on EEG dipole localization and their relations with surface electrode positions. , 1989, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[2]  F Vatta,et al.  Accuracy of EEG dipole source localisation in presence of brain lesions. , 2000, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[3]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  ANIMAL+INSECT: Improved Cortical Structure Segmentation , 1999, IPMI.

[6]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Forward and inverse electroencephalographic modeling in health and in acute traumatic brain injury , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  F Wendling,et al.  EEG extended source localization: Tensor-based vs. conventional methods , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. Gotman,et al.  Modeling of post-surgical brain and skull defects in the EEG inverse problem with the boundary element method , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Michel,et al.  Accuracy of EEG source imaging of epileptic spikes in patients with large brain lesions , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Bart Vanrumste,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Review on Solving the Inverse Problem in Eeg Source Analysis , 2022 .

[11]  S. Makeig,et al.  Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization , 2013, Brain Topography.

[12]  ProblemsPer Christian HansenDepartment The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems , 2000 .

[13]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.