Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis

[1]  Thomas G. Walker,et al.  Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography. , 2014, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  A. Davies,et al.  Chapter II: Diagnostic methods. , 2011, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  C. Bent,et al.  64-section CT angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and severe claudication: comparison with digital subtractive angiography. , 2011, Clinical radiology.

[4]  Jiang Lin,et al.  Imaging evaluation of calf arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories on MR scanner , 2011 .

[5]  Christian Reiterer,et al.  Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease—accuracy of maximum intensity projections in clinical routine and subgroup analysis , 2011, European Radiology.

[6]  F. Zaccagna,et al.  First-Pass and High-Resolution Steady-State Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Peripheral Arteries With Gadobenate Dimeglumine: An Assessment of Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Qiao Rui-hu.  Evaluation of diabetic peripheral arterial disease in lower limb by using 3.0 T contrast-enhanced MR angiography with simultaneous calf compression , 2011 .

[8]  Zhen Jin,et al.  An in vitro experimental study and clinical applications of MR angiography with low-dose contrast agent of lower limb arteries at 3.0 T , 2010 .

[9]  H. Pan,et al.  Single‐dose time‐resolved contrast enhanced hybrid MR angiography in diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease: Compared with digital subtraction angiography , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  J. Menke,et al.  Meta-analysis: Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Assessing Steno-occlusions in Peripheral Arterial Disease , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  P. Mildenberger,et al.  Comparison of contrast‐enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Results of a phase III multicenter trial , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  J. Vymazal,et al.  Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries. , 2010, Radiology.

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[14]  J. Zarocostas.  Non-communicable diseases must have greater priority, says WHO , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  L. Oğuzkurt,et al.  Atherosclerotic risk factors and segmental distribution in symptomatic peripheral artery disease. , 2009, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[16]  L. Murray,et al.  Critical lower-limb ischemia: the diagnostic performance of dual-phase injection MR angiography (including high-resolution distal imaging) compared with digital subtraction angiography. , 2009, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[17]  M. Koelemay,et al.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2009, JAMA.

[18]  Stefan Feuerbach,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of intraarterial and i.v. MR angiography for the detection of stenoses of the infrainguinal arteries. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Guo Qi-yong.  Application of energy subtract angiography of dual source CT in diagnosis of arterial diseases of the lower extremities , 2009 .

[20]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Feasibility of Peripheral Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 3.0 Tesla With a Hybrid Technique: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[21]  Teng Gao-ju.  The comparative study of 64-slices spiral CT angiography with DSA in lower extremity arterial occlusive diseases , 2008 .

[22]  D. Gan.  Imaging technique and postprocessing of lower extremity arteries using 64-slice CT , 2008 .

[23]  Feng Kai-lin.  Diagnostic value of 64-slice computed tomography angiography for peripheral arterial occlusive diseases , 2008 .

[24]  Jaap Stoker,et al.  Multivariate random-effects approach: for meta-analysis of cancer staging studies. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[25]  赵斌,et al.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the classification of peripheral arterial occlusive disease , 2007 .

[26]  H. Bonel,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: Prospective Comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[27]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[28]  V. Bertone,et al.  Vascular involvement in diabetic subjects with ischemic foot ulcer: a new morphologic categorization of disease severity. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[29]  D. Nanz,et al.  Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[30]  Sun Yong-tao.  Application of multi-slice spiral CT angiography in diagnosis of arteriosclerotic occlusive disease of lower extremity , 2007 .

[31]  G. Jin.  The diagnostic value of 64-multislice CT in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive diseases:comparison with digital subtraction angiography , 2007 .

[32]  L. Norgren,et al.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[33]  Y. Fei,et al.  Multiposition dynamic contrast enhanced MR angiography in peripheral vessel diseases at 3.0T MR , 2006 .

[34]  Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, colour duplex and digital subtraction angiography of the lower limb arteries from the aorta to the tibio-peroneal trunk in patients with intermittent claudication. , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[35]  Pascal Desgranges,et al.  Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  S. Wilson,et al.  Comparison of CT and Catheter Arteriography for Evaluation of Peripheral Arterial Disease , 2005, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[37]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. , 2005, Radiology.

[38]  Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries , 2005, European Radiology.

[39]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. , 2005, Radiology.

[40]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil. , 2005, Radiology.

[41]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: Feasibility study , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  V. MIu,et al.  [Combined bolus magnetic resonance angiography and two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in patients with occlusive diseases of lower limb arteries]. , 2005 .

[43]  I. Mikhailov,et al.  [Combined bolus magnetic resonance angiography and two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in patients with occlusive diseases of lower limb arteries]. , 2005, Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia = Angiology and vascular surgery.

[44]  M. Tillich,et al.  Routine Use of Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Moving-Table MR Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Comparison with Selective Digital Subtraction Angiography , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[45]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients With Chronic Critical Ischemia and Tissue Loss , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[46]  C. Catalano,et al.  Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. , 2004, Radiology.

[47]  M. Hunink,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease: sensitivity-encoded multiposition MR angiography compared with intraarterial angiography and conventional multiposition MR angiography. , 2004, Radiology.

[48]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2002 .

[49]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[50]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[51]  M. Reiser,et al.  Moving-table MR angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels: comparison of body coil and dedicated phased array coil systems. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  K. H. Tay,et al.  Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[53]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Prospective blinded evaluation of Gd-DOTA- versus Gd-BOPTA-enhanced peripheral MR angiography, as compared with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, Radiology.

[54]  J. Brossmann,et al.  Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Comparison with intraarterial DSA. , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[55]  Ahuva Engel,et al.  Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[56]  P Leander,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[57]  H. Noda,et al.  Table-moving Contrast-Enhanced MRA of the Lower Extremities in Patients with Arterial Occlusive Disease:Its Diagnostic Acuracy and Reliability in Cmparison with IA-DSA , 2003 .

[58]  K. Kreitner,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[59]  J. Cardella,et al.  Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[60]  M. Lepäntalo,et al.  Claudication does not always precede critical leg ischemia , 2001, Vascular medicine.

[61]  Ralf Puls,et al.  Mehrschicht-spiral-CT: 3D CT-angiographie zur evaluation therapeutisch relevanter stenosen bei peripherer arterieller verschlußkrankheit , 2001 .

[62]  R Felix,et al.  [Multi-slice spiral CT: 3D CT angiography for evaluating therapeutically relevant stenosis in peripheral arterial occlusive disease]. , 2001, Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik.

[63]  J. Seitz,et al.  Kontrastmittelverstärkte MR-Angiographie der Becken- und Beinarterien mit Schrittverschiebetechnik unter Einsatz eines dedizierten Spulensystems. Erste klinische Erfahrungen , 2000 .

[64]  I. Ringqvist,et al.  Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease: Duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography , 2000, Acta radiologica.

[65]  E. Sueyoshi,et al.  Symptomatic peripheral vascular tree stenosis: Comparison of subtracted and nonsubtracted 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with fat suppression , 2000, Acta radiologica.

[66]  W. Nitz,et al.  [Contrast media-enhanced MR angiography of the lower extremity arteries using a dedicated peripheral vascular coil system. First clinical results]. , 2000, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[67]  M. Völk,et al.  Kontrastmittelverstärkte MR-Angiographie der Becken- und Beingefäße mit automatisierter Tischverschiebetechnik , 1999 .

[68]  K Scheffler,et al.  Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[69]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[70]  W. Nitz,et al.  [Contrast medium-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvic and leg vessels with an automated table-feed technique]. , 1999, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[71]  H. Benamer,et al.  Prospective evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease by 2D MR subtraction angiography , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[72]  G Johnson,et al.  Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[73]  M. Thelen,et al.  CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[74]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[75]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[76]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .