The optical volume scattering function in a surf zone inverted to derive sediment and bubble particle subpopulations

[1] The effects of particle fields including bubbles on the optical volume scattering function (VSF) were investigated in the surf zone off Scripps Pier as part of an ongoing effort to better understand the underlying dynamics in the VSF in the subsurface ocean. VSFs were measured at 20 Hz at angles spanning 10°–170° in 10° increments with a device called the Multiangle Scattering Optical Tool (MASCOT). Modification of the phase function was observed in passing suspended sediment plumes, wave-injected bubble plumes, and combinations of these particle populations relative to the background. Phase function enhancement in the 60°–80° range was observed in association with bubble plumes, consistent with theoretical predictions. VSFs were inverted to infer size distributions and composition using a least squares minimization fitting procedure applied to a library of phase functions, each representing a lognormally distributed subpopulation with refractive index and coating, where applicable. Phase functions representative of nonspherical mineral particle subpopulations were computed using discrete dipole approximation (DDA) and improved geometric optics method (IGOM) techniques for randomly oriented, asymmetric hexahedra. Phase functions for coated bubbles were computed with the Lorenz-Mie theory. Inversion results exhibited stable solutions that qualitatively agreed with concurrent acoustical measurements of bubbles, aggregate particle size distribution expectations, and anecdotal videography evidence from the field. Although a comparable inversion with a library that assumed spherical shaped particles alone provided less stable results with some incorrectly assigned subpopulations, several dominant subpopulation trends were consistent with the results obtained using nonspherical representations of mineral particles.

[1]  Grant B. Deane,et al.  Scale dependence of bubble creation mechanisms in breaking waves , 2002, Nature.

[2]  A. Sciandra,et al.  Determining Size Distributions and Composition of Particles Suspended in Water: A New SEM-EDS Protocol with Validation and Comparison to Other Methods , 2012 .

[3]  W. Balch,et al.  Size distribution of marine submicron particles determined by flow field‐flow fractionation , 2000 .

[4]  Joan S. Cleveland,et al.  Numerical model for prediction of sublittoral optical visibility , 1994, Other Conferences.

[5]  E. Gillary,et al.  A microscopic investigation of bubble formation nuclei , 1984 .

[6]  A. Longhurst,et al.  Sub-micron particles in northwest Atlantic shelf water , 1992 .

[7]  Xiaodong Zhang,et al.  Scattering by pure seawater: effect of salinity. , 2009, Optics express.

[8]  David M. Farmer,et al.  A Free-Flooding Acoustical Resonator for Measurement of Bubble Size Distributions , 1998 .

[9]  B. Epstein The mathematical description of certain breakage mechanisms leading to the logarithmico-normal distribution , 1947 .

[10]  J. W. Campbell,et al.  Variance within homogeneous phytoplankton populations, II: Analysis of clonal cultures. , 1989, Cytometry.

[11]  J. Kirk,et al.  Monte Carlo modeling of the performance of a reflective tube absorption meter. , 1992, Applied optics.

[12]  Dale A. Kiefer,et al.  Light scattering by microorganisms in the open ocean , 1991 .

[13]  Michael S. Twardowski,et al.  Measuring optical backscattering in water , 2013 .

[14]  J. Ronald V. Zaneveld,et al.  The determination of the index of refraction distribution of oceanic particulates , 1974 .

[15]  Miroslaw Jonasz,et al.  Nonsphericity of suspended marine particles and its influence on light scattering1 , 1987 .

[16]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[17]  J. Ronald,et al.  Method for the determination of the index of refraction of particles suspended in the ocean , 1973 .

[18]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Light scattering by small particles. Von H. C. VANDE HULST. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 1981. Paperback, 470 S., 103 Abb. und 46 Tab., US $ 7.50 , 1984 .

[19]  David McKee,et al.  Scattering error corrections for in situ absorption and attenuation measurements. , 2008, Optics express.

[20]  M. J. Richardson,et al.  Biophysical forcing of particle production and distribution during a spring bloom in the North Atlantic , 1993 .

[21]  Michael Twardowski,et al.  Retrieving composition and sizes of oceanic particle subpopulations from the volume scattering function. , 2011, Applied optics.

[22]  Michael S. Twardowski,et al.  Microscale Quantification of the Absorption by Dissolved and Particulate Material in Coastal Waters with an ac-9 , 1999 .

[23]  James C. Kitchen,et al.  Particle size distributions and the vertical distribution of suspended matter in the upwelling region off Oregon , 1977 .

[24]  H. Fukuda,et al.  Submicrometer particles in northwest Pacific coastal environments: Abundance, size distribution, and biological origins , 1998 .

[25]  D.W. Pfitsch,et al.  Development of a free-drifting submersible digital holographic imaging system , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[26]  H. Gordon Rayleigh-Gans scattering approximation: surprisingly useful for understanding backscattering from disk-like particles. , 2007, Optics express.

[27]  Sean G. Herring,et al.  Shape of the particulate beam attenuation spectrum and its inversion to obtain the shape of the particulate size distribution. , 2001, Applied optics.

[28]  M. Wells,et al.  Marine submicron particles , 1992 .

[29]  T. J. Petzold Volume Scattering Functions for Selected Ocean Waters , 1972 .

[30]  J. Katz,et al.  The response of microscopic bubbles to sudden changes in the ambient pressure , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  Emmanuel Boss,et al.  Effect of particulate aggregation in aquatic environments on the beam attenuation and its utility as a proxy for particulate mass. , 2009, Optics express.

[32]  Y. C. Agrawal,et al.  Instruments for particle size and settling velocity observations in sediment transport , 2000 .

[33]  Dariusz Stramski,et al.  Measurements and characterization of particle size distributions in coastal waters , 2010 .

[34]  Eyvind Aas,et al.  The refractive index of phytoplankton , 1981 .

[35]  A. Barnard,et al.  In-Water Instrumentation and Platforms forOcean Color Remote Sensing Applications , 2007 .

[36]  L. N. Vicente,et al.  A comparison of block pivoting and interior-point algorithms for linear least squares problems with nonnegative variables , 1994 .

[37]  Dariusz Stramski,et al.  Bubble entrainment by breaking waves and their influence on optical scattering in the upper ocean , 2001 .

[38]  E. Fry,et al.  Absorption spectrum (380-700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements. , 1997, Applied optics.

[39]  Steven A. Freeman,et al.  Optical backscattering properties of the "clearest" natural waters , 2007 .

[40]  H. Gordon,et al.  Two component mie scattering models of sargasso sea particles. , 1973, Applied optics.

[41]  Ping Yang,et al.  Modeling optical properties of mineral aerosol particles by using nonsymmetric hexahedra. , 2010, Applied optics.

[42]  E. Fry,et al.  Empirical equation for the index of refraction of seawater. , 1995, Applied optics.

[43]  Alberto Tonizzo,et al.  Measurements and simulations of polarization states of underwater light in clear oceanic waters. , 2011, Applied optics.

[44]  Michael S. Twardowski,et al.  Resolving size distributions of bubbles with radii less than 30 μm with optical and acoustical methods , 2011 .

[45]  J R Zaneveld,et al.  Absorption and attenuation of visible and near-infrared light in water: dependence on temperature and salinity. , 1997, Applied optics.

[46]  S. Effler,et al.  SUSPENSOIDS IN NEW YORK CITY'S DRINKING WATER RESERVOIRS: TURBIDITY APPORTIONMENT 1 , 2002 .

[47]  K. Carder,et al.  Physical, Chemical, and Optical Measures of Suspended-Particle Concentrations: Their Intercomparison and Application to the West African Shelf , 1974 .

[48]  Michael S Twardowski,et al.  Angular shape of the oceanic particulate volume scattering function in the backward direction. , 2009, Applied optics.

[49]  A. Weidemann,et al.  Role of minerogenic particles in light scattering in lakes and a river in central New York. , 2007, Applied optics.

[50]  K. Stamnes,et al.  Comparison of numerical models for computing underwater light fields. , 1993, Applied optics.

[51]  E. Boss,et al.  Effects of particle aggregation and disaggregation on their inherent optical properties. , 2011, Optics express.

[52]  Jun Q. Lu,et al.  Determination of complex refractive index of polystyrene microspheres from 370 to 1610 nm , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[53]  Z. Kam,et al.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1998 .

[54]  H. Gordon,et al.  A THEORETICAL MODEL OF LIGHT SCATTERING BY SARGASSO SEA PARTICULATES1 , 1972 .

[55]  S. Twomey Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Indirect Measurements , 1997 .

[56]  Jianwei Wei,et al.  Polarized light field under dynamic ocean surfaces: Numerical modeling compared with measurements , 2011 .

[57]  C. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[58]  M. Su,et al.  Bubble size distribution under saltwater and freshwater breaking waves , 1993 .

[59]  Andrew H. Barnard,et al.  A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in case I and case II waters , 2001 .

[60]  W. Balch,et al.  Scattering and attenuation properties of Emiliania huxleyi cells and their detached coccoliths , 1998 .

[61]  Roman E. Glazman Effects of adsorbed films on gas bubble radial oscillations , 1983 .

[62]  H. V. Hulst Light Scattering by Small Particles , 1957 .

[63]  Xiaodong Zhang,et al.  The volume scattering function of natural bubble populations , 2002 .

[64]  S. Baldy,et al.  Bubbles in the close vicinity of breaking waves: Statistical characteristics of the generation and dispersion mechanism , 1988 .

[65]  M. D. Stokes,et al.  Air Entrainment Processes and Bubble Size Distributions in the Surf Zone , 1999 .

[66]  Lee Karp-Boss,et al.  INHERENT OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF NON-SPHERICAL MARINE-LIKE PARTICLES — FROM THEORY TO OBSERVATION , 2007 .

[67]  Hartmut Prandke,et al.  Comparison of measured and computed light scattering the Baltic , 1986 .

[68]  Heidi M. Dierssen,et al.  A regional comparison of particle size distributions and the power law approximation in oceanic and estuarine surface waters , 2010 .

[69]  Janet W. Campbell,et al.  The lognormal distribution as a model for bio‐optical variability in the sea , 1995 .

[70]  Casey C. Moore,et al.  Scattering error correction of reflecting-tube absorption meters , 1994, Other Conferences.

[71]  O. Mikkelsen,et al.  Empirical forward scattering phase functions from 0.08 to 16 deg. for randomly shaped terrigenous 1-21 microm sediment grains. , 2009, Optics express.

[72]  F. S. Lai,et al.  The self-preserving particle size distribution for Brownian coagulation in the free-molecule regime , 1972 .

[73]  David M Farmer,et al.  Improvements to the methods used to measure bubble attenuation using an underwater acoustical resonator. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  Michael S Twardowski,et al.  Use of optical scattering to discriminate particle types in coastal waters. , 2005, Applied optics.

[75]  T Platt,et al.  Effect of the particle-size distribution on the backscattering ratio in seawater. , 1994, Applied optics.