Decitabine Versus Hydroxyurea for Advanced Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial Within the EMSCO Network

PURPOSE Hydroxyurea (HY) is a reference treatment of advanced myeloproliferative neoplasms. We conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing decitabine (DAC) and HY in advanced myeloproliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Newly diagnosed myeloproliferative CMML patients with advanced disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous DAC (20 mg/m2/d days 1-5) or HY (1-4 g/d) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS), events being death and acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AML) transformation or progression. RESULTS One-hundred seventy patients received DAC (n = 84) or HY (n = 86). Median age was 72 and 74 years, and median WBC count 32.5 × 109/L and 31.2 × 109/L in the DAC and HY arms, respectively. Thirty-three percent of DAC and 31% of HY patients had CMML-2. Patients received a median of five DAC and six HY cycles. With a median follow-up of 17.5 months, median EFS was 12.1 months in the DAC arm and 10.3 months in the HY arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.16; P = .27). There was no significant interaction between treatment effect and blast or platelet count, anemia, CMML Prognostic Scoring System, Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies, or CMML Prognostic Scoring System-mol risk. Fifty-three (63%) DAC patients achieved a response compared with 30 (35%) HY patients (P = .0004). Median duration of response was similar in both arms (DAC, 16.3 months; HY, 17.4 months; P = .90). Median overall survival was 18.4 months in the DAC arm and 21.9 months in the HY arm (P = .67). Compared with HY, DAC significantly reduced the risk of CMML progression or transformation to acute myelomonocytic leukemia (cause-specific HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.94; P = .005) at the expense of death without progression or transformation (cause-specific HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.82 to 2.9; P = .04). CONCLUSION Compared with HY, frontline treatment with DAC did not improve EFS in patients with advanced myeloproliferative CMML (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02214407).

[1]  M. Voso,et al.  Infection control in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes who are candidates for active treatment: Expert panel consensus-based recommendations. , 2019, Blood reviews.

[2]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Validation of the 2017 revision of the WHO chronic myelomonocytic leukemia categories. , 2018, Blood advances.

[3]  O. Abdel-Wahab,et al.  A phase II, multicentre trial of decitabine in higher-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia , 2017, Leukemia.

[4]  Xue-chun Lu,et al.  A comparison of therapeutic dosages of decitabine in treating myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis , 2017, Annals of Hematology.

[5]  E. Solary,et al.  How I treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. , 2017, Blood.

[6]  M. Konopleva,et al.  Natural history of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents , 2017, American journal of hematology.

[7]  Validation of response assessment according to international consortium for MDS/MPN criteria in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents , 2017, Blood cancer journal.

[8]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Integrating clinical features and genetic lesions in the risk assessment of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. , 2016, Blood.

[9]  Mario Cazzola,et al.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. , 2016, Blood.

[10]  M. Cazzola,et al.  An international consortium proposal of uniform response criteria for myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) in adults. , 2015, Blood.

[11]  P. Cauchy,et al.  A multi-centre phase 2 study of azacitidine in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia , 2014, Leukemia.

[12]  R. Laborde,et al.  Mayo prognostic model for WHO-defined chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: ASXL1 and spliceosome component mutations and outcomes , 2013, Leukemia.

[13]  J. Maciejewski,et al.  Predictive factors of response and survival among chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients treated with azacitidine. , 2013, Leukemia research.

[14]  L. Arenillas,et al.  Development and validation of a prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. , 2013, Blood.

[15]  A. Vekhoff,et al.  Molecular predictors of response to decitabine in advanced chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a phase 2 trial. , 2011, Blood.

[16]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. , 2009, Blood.

[17]  H. Byun,et al.  Hydroxycarbamide in combination with azacitidine or decitabine is antagonistic on DNA methylation inhibition , 2007, British journal of haematology.