Induced seismicity and its implications for CO2 storage risk

Seismicity induced by fl uid injection and extraction is a widely observed phenomenon. These earthquakes can exceed magnitudes of M 6 and have the potential to impact on the containment, infrastructure and public perceptions of safety at CO2 storage sites. We examine induced seismicity globally using published data from 75 sites dominated by water injection and hydrocarbon extraction to estimate the timing (relative to injection/extraction), locations, size range and numbers of induced earthquakes. Most induced earthquakes occur during injection/extraction (~70%) and are clustered at shallow depths in the region of the reservoir. The rates and maximum magnitudes of induced earthquakes generally increase with rising reservoir pressures, total fluid volumes and injection/extraction rates. The likelihood of an earthquake greater than or equal to a given magnitude being induced during injection is approximately proportional to the total volume of fluid injected/extracted, which appears to provide a proxy fo r changes in rock dynamics. If this observation holds for C O2 storage sites, then we can expect the rates and maximum magnitudes of induced earthquakes to be significantly higher fo r commercial-scale operations (e.g., 50 Mt) than for pilot projects (e.g., 50 kt). In accord with these results the risks associated with induced seismicity may also rise with project size. Mitigation and monitoring measures at commercial-size sequestration sites, including installation of microseismic networks, public education on the expected seismicity and pressure relief wells, will be key for risk reduction.

[1]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Scaling of seismicity induced by nonlinear fluid-rock interaction , 2009 .

[2]  D. Wyborn,et al.  Investigation of Fault Mechanisms during Geothermal Reservoir Stimulation Experiments in the Cooper Basin, Australia , 2009 .

[3]  D. Wyborn,et al.  Induced Seismicity during the Stimulation of a Geothermal hfr Reservoir in the Cooper Basin, Australia , 2006 .

[4]  Nicolas Cuenot,et al.  Large earthquakes during hydraulic stimulations at the geothermal site of Soultz-sous-Forêts , 2007 .

[5]  Joel Sminchak,et al.  Aspects of induced seismic activity and deep-well sequestration of carbon dioxide , 2003 .

[6]  Reinhard Jung,et al.  A numerical model for fluid injection induced seismicity at Soultz-sous-Forêts , 2010 .

[7]  Won-Young Kim,et al.  A Fluid-Injection-Triggered Earthquake Sequence in Ashtabula, Ohio: Implications for Seismogenesis in Stable Continental Regions , 2004 .

[8]  Lisa V. Block,et al.  Deep-Injection and Closely Monitored Induced Seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado , 2005 .

[9]  C. Dinske,et al.  Probability of a given‐magnitude earthquake induced by a fluid injection , 2007 .

[10]  A. McGarr On a possible connection between three major earthquakes in California and oil production , 1991 .

[11]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Triggered earthquakes and deep well activities , 1992 .

[12]  William Walden Rubey,et al.  The Denver EarthquakeS. , 1968, Science.

[13]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Fault Activation During Hydraulic Fracturing , 2010 .

[14]  William Hung Kan Lee,et al.  International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology , 2002 .

[15]  A. McGarr,et al.  40 – Case Histories of Induced and Triggered Seismicity , 2002 .

[16]  F. Ladner,et al.  Hydraulic Characteristics of the Basel 1 Enhanced Geothermal System , 2009 .

[17]  Hans-Peter Harjes,et al.  Injection-induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site, Germany , 1997 .