The role of binocular vision in walking

Despite the extensive investigation of binocular and stereoscopic vision, relatively little is known about its importance in natural visually guided behavior. In this paper, we explored the role of binocular vision when walking over and around obstacles. We monitored eye position during the task as an indicator of the difference between monocular and binocular performances. We found that binocular vision clearly facilitates walking performance. Walkers were slowed by about 10% in monocular vision and raised their foot higher when stepping over obstacles. Although the location and sequence of the fixations did not change in monocular vision, the timing of the fixations relative to the actions was different. Subjects spent proportionately more time fixating the obstacles and fixated longer while guiding foot placement near an obstacle. The data are consistent with greater uncertainty in monocular vision, leading to a greater reliance on feedback in the control of the movements.

[1]  Yang Liu,et al.  Disparity statistics in natural scenes. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[2]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Understanding the contribution of binocular vision to the control of adaptive locomotion , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Temporal properties of the polarity advantage effect in crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[4]  S. McKee,et al.  The imprecision of stereopsis , 1990, Vision Research.

[5]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Mary M Hayhoe,et al.  Task and context determine where you look. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[7]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  B. Rogers,et al.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  Simon J Watt,et al.  The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Hollands,et al.  Coordination of Eye and Leg Movements During Visually Guided Stepping , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Paul B Hibbard,et al.  Binocular cues and the control of prehension. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[14]  A E Patla,et al.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path? , 1997, Neuroreport.

[15]  Jeff B. Pelz,et al.  Predictive eye movements in squash , 2010 .

[16]  R K Jones,et al.  Why two eyes are better than one: the two views of binocular vision. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Visual Control of Action Without Retinal Optic Flow , 2006, Psychological science.