Developmental causes of allometry: new models and implications for phenotypic plasticity and evolution.

Shapes change during development because tissues, organs, and various anatomical features differ in onset, rate, and duration of growth. Allometry is the study of the consequences of differences in the growth of body parts on morphology, although the field of allometry has been surprisingly little concerned with understanding the causes of differential growth. The power-law equation y = ax(b), commonly used to describe allometries, is fundamentally an empirical equation whose biological foundation has been little studied. Huxley showed that the power-law equation can be derived if one assumes that body parts grow with exponential kinetics, for exactly the same amount of time. In life, however, the growth of body parts is almost always sigmoidal, and few, if any, grow for exactly the same amount of time during ontogeny. Here, we explore the shapes of allometries that result from real growth patterns and analyze them with new allometric equations derived from sigmoidal growth kinetics. We use an extensive ontogenetic dataset of the growth of internal organs in the rat from birth to adulthood, and show that they grow with Gompertz sigmoid kinetics. Gompertz growth parameters of body and internal organs accurately predict the shapes of their allometries, and that nonlinear regression on allometric data can accurately estimate the underlying kinetics of growth. We also use these data to discuss the developmental relationship between static and ontogenetic allometries. We show that small changes in growth kinetics can produce large and apparently qualitatively different allometries. Large evolutionary changes in allometry can be produced by small and simple changes in growth kinetics, and we show how understanding the development of traits can greatly simplify the interpretation of how they evolved.

[1]  P. Verhulst Notice sur la loi que la population pursuit dans son accroissement , 1838 .

[2]  C. Pantin Problems of Relative Growth , 1932, Nature.

[3]  J. Huxley Problems of relative growth , 1932 .

[4]  J. Needham,et al.  Terminology of Relative Growth-Rates , 1940, Nature.

[5]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[6]  Laird Ak DYNAMICS OF TUMOR GROWTH. , 1964 .

[7]  A. K. Laird Dynamics of Tumour Growth , 1964, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  S. Gould,et al.  Interpretation of the Coefficient in the Allometric Equation , 1965, The American Naturalist.

[9]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[10]  J. Schröder Antler and Body Weight Allometry in Red Deer: A Comparison of Statistical Estimators , 1983 .

[11]  J. Lighton,et al.  Curvilinear allometry, energetics and foraging ecology: a comparison of leaf-cutting ants and army ants , 1988 .

[12]  The role of time and size in ontogenetic allometry: II. An empirical study of human growth. , 1989, Growth, development, and aging : GDA.

[13]  Michael LaBarbera,et al.  ANALYZING BODY SIZE AS A FACTOR IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1989 .

[14]  D. Wheeler The Developmental Basis of Worker Caste Polymorphism in Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Diana E. Wheeler,et al.  Growth Models of Complex Allometries in Holometabolous Insects , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[16]  D. Emlen,et al.  ARTIFICIAL SELECTION ON HORN LENGTH‐BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY IN THE HORNED BEETLE ONTHOPHAGUS ACUMINATUS (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Hormonal control of male horn length dimorphism in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). , 1999, Journal of insect physiology.

[19]  D. Roff Phenotypic Evolution — A Reaction Norm Perspective , 1999, Heredity.

[20]  J. Miller,et al.  Protein malnutrition affects the growth trajectories of the craniofacial skeleton in rats. , 1999, The Journal of nutrition.

[21]  R. German,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and ontogenetic allometry of soft tissues in Rattus norvegicus , 1999, Journal of morphology.

[22]  D. Emlen,et al.  Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  R. German,et al.  Bones, muscles and visceral organs of protein-malnourished rats (Rattus norvegicus) grow more slowly but for longer durations to reach normal final size. , 2000, The Journal of nutrition.

[24]  J. Gayon,et al.  History of the Concept of Allometry1 , 2000 .

[25]  H. Nijhout,et al.  The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. , 2000, Annual review of entomology.

[26]  J. Gayon,et al.  History of the Concept of Allometry , 2000 .

[27]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Hormonal control of male horn length dimorphism in Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a second critical period of sensitivity to juvenile hormone. , 2001, Journal of insect physiology.

[28]  R. German,et al.  Ontogenetic allometry in the locomotor skeleton of specialized half-bounding mammals , 2002 .

[29]  A. Moczek Allometric plasticity in a polyphenic beetle , 2002 .

[30]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Developmental mechanisms of threshold evolution in a polyphenic beetle , 2002, Evolution & development.

[31]  H. Nijhout Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms , 2003, Evolution & development.

[32]  C. E. Allen,et al.  Genotype to Phenotype: Physiological Control of Trait Size and Scaling in Insects1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.

[33]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Rapid evolution of a polyphenic threshold , 2003, Evolution & development.

[34]  R. Weladji,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and intercorhort variation in reindeer calf antler length is associated with density and weather , 2005, Oecologia.

[35]  P. Bates,et al.  Developmental model of static allometry in holometabolous insects , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  I. Dworkin,et al.  Many ways to be small: different environmental regulators of size generate distinct scaling relationships in Drosophila melanogaster , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing‐body allometry in Manduca sexta , 2010, Evolution & development.

[38]  H. Nijhout,et al.  The Cellular and Physiological Mechanism of Wing-Body Scaling in Manduca sexta , 2010, Science.

[39]  H. Nijhout Dependence of morphometric allometries on the growth kinetics of body parts. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  P. Haccou Mathematical Models of Biology , 2022 .