Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist.

OBJECTIVE The aim of the work was to establish optimum ambient light conditions for viewing radiologic images of the wrist on liquid crystal display monitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five ambient light levels were investigated: 480, 100, 40, 25, and 7 lux. Seventy-nine experienced radiologists were asked to examine 30 posteroanterior wrist images and decide whether a fracture was present. All images were displayed on liquid crystal display monitors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the numbers of false-positive and false-negative findings were recorded. RESULTS For all the radiologists, greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and lower numbers of false-positive and false-negative findings were recorded at 40 and 25 lux compared with 480 and 100 lux. At 7 lux, the results were generally similar to those at 480 and 100 lux. The experience and knowledge of radiologists specializing in imaging of musculoskeletal trauma appeared to compensate in part for inappropriate lighting levels. CONCLUSION Typical office lighting and current recommendations on ambient lighting can reduce diagnostic efficacy compared with lower levels of ambient lighting. If, however, no light other than that of the monitor is used, results are similar to those with excessive levels of lighting. Careful control of ambient lighting is therefore required to ensure that diagnostic accuracy is maximized, particularly for clinicians not expert in interpreting posteroanterior wrist images.

[1]  P C Brennan,et al.  Viewing conditions for diagnostic images in three major Dublin hospitals: a comparison with WHO and CEC recommendations. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors. , 2005, Radiology.

[3]  B. Hemminger,et al.  Image presentation in digital radiology: perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  D Chawla,et al.  Quality Assurance In Diagnostic Radiology , 1990 .

[5]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  Stephen Balter A preliminary investigation of ambient light in the interventional fluoroscopy laboratory , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Peter Homolka,et al.  Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.

[9]  John Ryan,et al.  Optimization of region of interest luminances may enhance radiologists' light adaptation. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[10]  P C Brennan,et al.  Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Soft-Copy Reading of Digital Chest Radiographs: Effect of Ambient Light and Automatic Optimization of Monitor Luminance , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Rachel Toomey,et al.  The impact of acoustic noise found within clinical departments on radiology performance. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[14]  M. McEntee,et al.  Increased Acquisition Speed Settings can Significantly Decrease Patient Dose while Maintaining Imaging Quality during Direct Chest Radiography. , 2008, Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences.

[15]  Benjamin J. Pollard,et al.  Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions. , 2008, Medical physics.