Current concepts in the evaluation of multiple myeloma with MR imaging and FDG PET/CT.

Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous group of plasma cell neoplasms that primarily involve bone marrow but also may occur in the soft tissue. Although the disease varies in its manifestations and its course, it is eventually fatal in all cases. Over the past 2 decades, significant advances have been made in our understanding of the genetics and pathogenesis of multiple myeloma and in its treatment. The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) has improved sensitivity for the detection of this disease. PET aids in the identification of active multiple myeloma on the basis of FDG uptake, and MR imaging helps identify multiple myeloma from its infiltration of normal fat within the bone marrow, which occurs in characteristic patterns that correlate with the disease stage. The increased sensitivity of these advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques has led to further refinement of the classic Durie and Salmon staging system. In addition, these imaging techniques allow a more reliable assessment of the disease response to treatment with current regimens, which may include autologous stem cell transplantation as well as various medications. In lesions that respond to chemotherapeutic agents, the replacement of previously infiltrated marrow by fat is seen at MR imaging and decreased FDG uptake is seen at FDG PET; however, a lengthy and intensive regimen may be necessary before the MR imaging appearance of marrow normalizes. Lytic lesions seen at CT almost always persist even after successful treatment. To provide an accurate assessment, radiologists must be familiar not only with the appearances of multiple myeloma and its mimics but also with common treatment-related findings.

[1]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma. , 1992, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[2]  M. Schocke,et al.  Dialysis-related amyloidosis revisited. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Reinhard Vonthein,et al.  Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[4]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: importance of whole-body versus spinal MR imaging. , 2009, Radiology.

[5]  S. Salmon,et al.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival , 1975, Cancer.

[6]  O. Cope,et al.  Multiple myeloma. , 1948, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat-suppression and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. Meyer,et al.  Reduced F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake within marrow after external beam radiation. , 2000, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[9]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Multiple myeloma: clinical review and diagnostic imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  P. Pereira,et al.  The benefit of using whole‐body, low‐dose, nonenhanced, multidetector computed tomography for follow‐up and therapy response monitoring in patients with multiple myeloma , 2007, Cancer.

[11]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  MR appearance of multiple myeloma of the spine before and after treatment. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  C. Henschke,et al.  Effect of radiation therapy on thoracic and lumbar bone marrow: evaluation with MR imaging. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  H. Libshitz,et al.  Multiple myeloma: appearance at MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[14]  B. Maldague,et al.  Skeletal survey in advanced multiple myeloma: radiographic versus MR imaging survey , 1999, British journal of haematology.

[15]  R W Günther,et al.  Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  W. Lewis,et al.  Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. , 2008, American family physician.

[17]  J. Rossi,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation and Chemotherapy in Multiple Myeloma , 1996 .

[18]  B. Barlogie,et al.  The Arkansas approach to therapy of patients with multiple myeloma. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[19]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Multiple myeloma: MR patterns of response to treatment. , 1994, Radiology.

[20]  P. Kuo,et al.  Artifactual spinal metastases imaged by PET/CT: a case report. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[21]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Treatment of multiple myeloma. , 2004, Blood.

[22]  Terry M Therneau,et al.  A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. Kyle,et al.  Epidemiology of the plasma-cell disorders. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[24]  E Terpos,et al.  International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma , 2009, Leukemia.

[25]  D. Bluemke,et al.  MR imaging in patients at risk for developing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: protocols, practices, and imaging techniques to maximize patient safety. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[26]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Femoral head avascular necrosis: correlation of MR imaging, radiographic staging, radionuclide imaging, and clinical findings. , 1987, Radiology.

[27]  B. Maldague,et al.  Stage III multiple myeloma: clinical and prognostic value of spinal bone marrow MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[28]  B. Line,et al.  Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[29]  E. Kotter,et al.  Whole-body MRI in the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with plasma cell neoplasms in comparison to the radiological skeletal survey , 2006, European Radiology.

[30]  M. Mulligan Skeletal abnormalities in multiple myeloma. , 2005, Radiology.

[31]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Multiple myeloma: spinal MR imaging in patients with untreated newly diagnosed disease. , 1992, Radiology.

[32]  Kevin P. Banks,et al.  AJR teaching file: Diffuse osteosclerosis with hepatosplenomegaly. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  M. Reiser,et al.  Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  W A Murphy,et al.  Bone marrow imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[35]  J. Becker,et al.  Multiple myeloma and contrast media. , 1992, Radiology.

[36]  L. Escoda,et al.  Prognostic and biological implications of genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: t(4;14) is the most relevant adverse prognostic factor, whereas RB deletion as a unique abnormality is not associated with adverse prognosis , 2007, Leukemia.

[37]  L. Baldini,et al.  Role of different hematologic variables in defining the risk of malignant transformation in monoclonal gammopathy. , 1996, Blood.

[38]  R. Fanin,et al.  A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. , 2007, Haematologica.

[39]  Kozawa Eito,et al.  Vertebral neoplastic compression fractures: Assessment by dual‐phase chemical shift imaging , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  Gary Caputo,et al.  Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  G. Roodman,et al.  Multiple myeloma bone disease: Pathophysiology of osteoblast inhibition. , 2006, Blood.

[42]  B. Barlogie,et al.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. , 2009, Blood.

[43]  L. Assael,et al.  Imaging Findings of Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaws , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[44]  T. Therneau,et al.  POEMS syndrome: definitions and long-term outcome. , 2003, Blood.

[45]  G. Morgan,et al.  Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. , 2003, The hematology journal : the official journal of the European Haematology Association.

[46]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple myeloma: diagnostic and clinical implications. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  M. Modic,et al.  Vertebral hemangiomas: MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[48]  D. Dingli,et al.  Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. , 2008, Blood.

[49]  D. Disler,et al.  Musculoskeletal imaging : the requisites , 2002 .

[50]  R. Bataille,et al.  The retinoblastoma susceptibility gene RB-1 in multiple myeloma. , 1997, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[51]  I. Reid,et al.  Osteonecrosis of the jaw , 2008, Skeletal Radiology.

[52]  S. Eustace,et al.  Whole-Body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[53]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[54]  M. Castillo Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine: is it reliable? , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[55]  T. Howe,et al.  Subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures in patients on alendronate therapy: a caution. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[56]  E. Outwater,et al.  The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[57]  R. Kyle,et al.  Nonsecretory myeloma, immunoglobulin D myeloma, and plasma cell leukemia. , 1999, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[58]  J. Crowley,et al.  International staging system for multiple myeloma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Avascular necrosis of femoral and/or humeral heads in multiple myeloma: results of a prospective study of patients treated with dexamethasone-based regimens and high-dose chemotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[60]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Increased risk of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma receiving thalidomide and chemotherapy. , 2001, Blood.

[61]  D. Samson,et al.  Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2005 , 2006, British journal of haematology.

[62]  B. Durie The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[63]  Margaret Hall-Craggs,et al.  Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of myeloma , 2007, British journal of haematology.

[64]  B. Maldague,et al.  Treated plasma cell lesions of bone with MRI signs of response to treatment: unexpected pathological findings , 1998, Skeletal Radiology.

[65]  S. Eustace,et al.  Accuracy of whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal survey in the detection of myelomatous lesions, and correlation of disease distribution with whole-body MRI (WBMRI) , 2009, Skeletal Radiology.

[66]  F. Sim,et al.  Effect of granulocyte-stimulating factors on marrow of adult patients with musculoskeletal malignancies: incidence and MRI findings. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[67]  S. Dechambre,et al.  Bone marrow transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: prognostic significance of MR imaging. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[68]  R. Bataille,et al.  Bone scintigraphy in plasma-cell myeloma. A prospective study of 70 patients. , 1982, Radiology.

[69]  A. Waxman,et al.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[70]  C. Galant,et al.  Benign vertebral hemangioma: MR-histological correlation , 2001, Skeletal Radiology.

[71]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Comparison of whole-body MR imaging and conventional X-ray examination in patients with multiple myeloma and implications for therapy , 2009, Annals of Hematology.

[72]  W. Reinus,et al.  MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[73]  H. Avet-Loiseau Role of genetics in prognostication in myeloma. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.