Supplier flexibility in the order-to-delivery process – a customer perspective

Flexibility is one enabler of efficient use of resources, and is therefore an antecedent to sustainability. The purpose of this article is to identify supplier flexibility variables in, and related to, the order-to-delivery (OTD) process and categorize them into a framework, followed by empirically exploring the framework. A perception-based survey was sent to Swedish purchasing managers. 289 responses were received. After descriptive gap analysis, exploratory factor analysis was applied to structure the responses into factors. This formed the basis for hierarchical linear regression analysis, explaining supplier flexibility. A conceptual framework, specifying supplier flexibility into volume, delivery and information exchange dimensions and relating these dimensions to the OTD process, was developed. Significant negative gaps between actual and demanded volume flexibility and delivery flexibility were identified, while significant positive gaps were found for information exchange flexibility. The factor analysis revealed three factors. The regression analysis verified that OTD-related information exchange flexibility and OTD-related volume and delivery flexibility explain the variation in OTD-specific flexibility, and are important antecedents for supplier flexibility in the OTD process. Research limitations/implications A contribution to research is the framework – with defined, related and empirically validated flexibility types. The study proposes a perception-based way to capture supplier flexibility in the OTD process, which is of practical relevance when evaluating suppliers. Identifying, conceptualizing and capturing types of supplier flexibility in the OTD process is new related to academic literature. The wide empirical study, mapping supplier flexibility gaps, is unique in its focus.

[1]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[2]  Marjolein C.J. Caniëls,et al.  Supply chain flexibility A systematic literature review and identification of directions for future research , 2017 .

[3]  Nigel Slack,et al.  The Flexibility of Manufacturing Systems , 1987 .

[4]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Value chain flexibility: A dichotomy of competence and capability , 2002 .

[5]  Kamel A. Fantazy,et al.  Supply chain strategy, flexibility, and performance , 2014 .

[6]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  The development of a lean, agile and leagile supply network taxonomy based on differing types of flexibility , 2014 .

[7]  Padmanav Acharya,et al.  Supply Chain Flexibility: A Frame Work of Research Dimensions , 2013, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[8]  Philip Powell,et al.  Towards a definition of flexibility: in search of the Holy Grail? , 2000 .

[9]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Implementation and management framework for supply chain flexibility , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  An instrument for measuring supply chain flexibility for the textile and clothing companies , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Jerry C. Wei,et al.  Responding to schedule changes in build‐to‐order supply chains , 2005 .

[12]  B. Beamon Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods , 1998 .

[13]  Dawei Lu,et al.  Mind the perception gap , 2019, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.

[14]  Morgan Swink,et al.  The role of information connectivity in making flexible logistics programs successful , 2005 .

[15]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing , 2006 .

[16]  S. S. Rao,et al.  SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, SUPPLY FLEXIBILITY AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2010 .

[17]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility , 1999 .

[18]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions , 2000 .

[19]  Helena Forslund,et al.  Order‐to‐delivery process performance in delivery scheduling environments , 2008 .

[20]  M. Stevenson,et al.  Supply chain flexibility: an inter‐firm empirical study , 2009 .

[21]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[22]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  A framework for assessing value chain agility , 2006 .

[23]  Bart L. MacCarthy,et al.  The automotive Order-to-Delivery process: How should it be configured for different markets? , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Taho Yang,et al.  Integration of customer and supplier flexibility in a make-to-order industry , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[25]  Corinna Engelhardt-Nowitzki,et al.  Improving value chain flexibility and adaptability in build-to-order environments , 2012 .

[26]  W. Kim Order quantity flexibility as a form of customer service in a supply chain contract model , 2011 .

[27]  Mohammed Amine Balambo,et al.  Flexibility and agility: evolution and relationship , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[28]  W. Chung,et al.  IT‐enhanced order and delivery process of a fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) company: A case study , 2007 .

[29]  Markus Biehl,et al.  International supply chain agility ‐ Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty , 2001 .

[30]  Stefano Tonchia,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility: A literature review , 1998 .

[31]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Importance of innovation and flexibility in configuring supply network sustainability , 2018, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[32]  D. Upton The Management of Manufacturing Flexibility , 1994 .

[33]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..