Towards an Information Systems Design Research Framework: A Critical Realist Perspective

Information Systems (IS) research has a serious utilization and relevance problem. To increase IS research utilization and relevance, scholars argue that the mainstream IS research, which is based on the behavioral science paradigm, should be complemented with research based on the design science paradigm. The current IS design science frameworks and approaches have a strong focus on the IT artifact, in most cases an exclusive focus on the IT artifact. The frameworks and approaches have very little discussions and clarifications regarding underpinning philosophies, but most seem to be based on positivism, traditional realism, or pragmatism. This paper presents an alternative framework for IS design science research. The framework builds on that the aim of IS design science research is to develop practical knowledge for the design and realization of different classes of IS initiatives, where IS are viewed as sociotechnical systems and not just IT artifacts. The underpinning philosophy of the framework is critical realism which has been developed as an alternative to positivism and traditional realism as well as to constructivism (relativism). The framework proposes that the output of IS design science research is practical IS design knowledge in the form of field-tested and grounded technological rules. The IS design knowledge is developed through an IS design science research cycle. The paper presents how technological rules can be developed as well as the nature of such rules.

[1]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The Double Hurdles for Management Research , 1997 .

[2]  Malcolm Williams.  New strategies in social research , 2006 .

[3]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[4]  Martin Lipscomb,et al.  Critical Realism, Post‐positivism and the Possibility of Knowledge , 2006 .

[5]  Brian W. Hollocks.  Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Fadhel Kaboub.  Realistic Evaluation , 2004 .

[7]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[8]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[9]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations , 2003 .

[11]  J. Lovering,et al.  Reclaiming Reality , 1989 .

[12]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[13]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[14]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. , 1999 .

[15]  Steve Fleetwood.  Boylan and O'Gorman's causal holism: a critical realist evaluation , 2002 .

[16]  Mansoor A. F. Kazi,et al.  Realist evaluation in practice , 2003 .

[17]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The IS Core - VII: Towards Information Systems as a Science of Meta-Artifacts , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[19]  John Mingers,et al.  Re-Establishing the Real: Critical Realism and Information Systems , 2004 .

[20]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[21]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The IS Core - VIII: Defining the Core Properties of the IS Disciplines: Not Yet, Not Now , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[23]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  An analysis of research in computing disciplines , 2004, CACM.

[24]  Matthew Longshore Smith,et al.  Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[25]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[26]  Steven L. Alter.  Desperately Seeking Systems Thinking in the Information Systems Discipline , 2004, ICIS.

[27]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[28]  Amy B. Woszczynski,et al.  The Handbook of Information Systems Research , 2003 .

[29]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs , 2000 .

[30]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  Derek Layder.  Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research , 1998 .

[32]  Bonnie Mae Kaplan,et al.  Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice , 2004 .

[33]  Henry A. Landsberger,et al.  Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View , 1978 .

[34]  R. Torretti.  Mario Bunge: Scientific research. I. The search for system. II. The search for truth. Berlin Heidelberg. New York. Springer-Verlag. 1967 , 1967 .

[35]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies , 2004 .

[36]  Pertti Järvinen,et al.  SERIES OF PUBLICATIONS D  –  NET PUBLICATIONS , 2005 .

[37]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Actors and Networks or Agents and Structures: Towards a Realist View of Information Systems , 2002 .

[40]  Philip J. Dobson.  The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[41]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social Mechanisms: Social mechanisms: An introductory essay , 1998 .

[43]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  The identity crisis within the is discipline , 2003 .

[44]  Steve Fleetwood,et al.  The ontology of organisation and management studies , 2004 .

[45]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Is There a Scientific Method?@@@Scientific Research I: The Search for System@@@Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth , 1969 .

[46]  Sven A. Carlsson,et al.  Advancing Information Systems Evaluation (Research): A Critical Realist Approach , 2003 .

[47]  Anita Greenhill,et al.  Theory and Action for Emancipation: Elements of a Critical Realist Approach , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[48]  Sven A. Carlsson.  Using Critical Realism in IS Research , 2004 .

[49]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[50]  R. Bhaskar.  From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment , 2003 .

[51]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The information systems identity crisis , 2005 .

[52]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .