Predicting Learning Outcomes in Distance Learning Universities: Perspectives from an Integrated Model

The progressive spread of online academic courses is a result of the flexible and customisable nature of the related learning process, while some studies on students’ achievement in distance learning universities have underlined retention as a priority issue for future research. Despite the number of studies that have investigated specific variables related to online learning, there are no systemic reference models that consider specific online environmental variables, IT competence and outcomes together. This paper offers an integrated model to test the contribution of different variables in predicting student performance in online academic courses, building on the literature on the digital learning environment and achievement. The model, based on the initial Biggs’ 3P learning model, aims to evaluate technical competency and the ability to self-manage as personal variables; furthermore, it proposes the analysis of a set of perceptions related to course design. Through the proposed model, a student’s background, personal variables, perception of the physical learning environment and perception of the course design can be utilized as predictors of student performance. Future research should investigate the applicability of the model in academic distance learning contexts.

[1]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[3]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: testing of mediator effects and construct validity , 2007 .

[4]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2004 .

[5]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[6]  J. de la Fuente,et al.  Linear Relationship between Resilience, Learning Approaches, and Coping Strategies to Predict Achievement in Undergraduate Students , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Malcolm Tight,et al.  Phenomenography: the development and application of an innovative research design in higher education research , 2016 .

[8]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005 , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Alissa A. Lange.  Technology, instructional methods, and the systemic messiness of innovation: improving reading fluency for low socio-economic elementary school students , 2019, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[10]  Chin Hsi Lin,et al.  Online self-paced high-school class size and student achievement , 2018, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[11]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Staying the course: online education in the United States, 2008 , 2008 .

[12]  S. Renes,et al.  Strengths-Based Analysis of Student Success in Online Courses , 2018, Online Learning.

[13]  Rebecca A. Glazier.  Building Rapport to Improve Retention and Success in Online Classes , 2016 .

[14]  Brian P. Coppola,et al.  Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry , 2003 .

[15]  Velda McCune,et al.  The Conceptual Bases of Study Strategy Inventories , 2004 .

[16]  Christine Bauer,et al.  Student Perceptions of Online Learning: An Analysis of Online Course Evaluations , 2015 .

[17]  N. Entwistle.  Contrasting Perspectives on Learning , 2005 .

[18]  Zuraini Zakaria,et al.  Engaging Students On-Line:Does Gender Matter in Adoption of Learning Material Design? , 2013 .

[19]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[20]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[21]  Massimiliano Barattucci.  Approach to Study as an Indicator of the Quality of Teaching and of Learning Environment: the contribution of John Biggs , 2017 .

[22]  Elaine Martin,et al.  Academics’ experiences of understanding of their subject matter and the relationship of this to their experiences of teaching and learning , 2005 .

[23]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[24]  Elaine Pearson,et al.  Course developers as students: a designer perspective of the experience of learning online , 2004 .

[25]  Karen Swan,et al.  A collaborative, design-based approach to improving an online program , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[26]  Luke K. Fryer,et al.  A reciprocal test of perceptions of teaching quality and approaches to learning: A longitudinal examination of teaching-learning connections , 2018 .

[27]  Massimiliano Barattucci,et al.  Measuring learning environment perceptions: Validation of the Italian version of the Approach to Study Inventory and the Student Course Experience Questionnaire , 2012 .

[28]  Celia Popovic,et al.  Teaching for quality learning at university. (2nd Edn.) , 2013 .

[29]  Massimiliano Barattucci,et al.  Phenomenography in the Student Learning Perspective: A Review of Studies in Academic Contexts , 2018 .

[30]  P. Zeegers,et al.  Student learning in higher education: a path analysis of academic achievement in science , 2004 .

[31]  Justin D. Cochran,et al.  The Role of Student Characteristics in Predicting Retention in Online Courses , 2014 .

[32]  Paul Ashwin,et al.  Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. , 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.

[33]  Massimiliano Barattucci,et al.  An examination of the Applicability of Biggs' 3P Learning Process Model to Italian University , 2017 .

[34]  George Siemens,et al.  Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education , 2014 .

[35]  Marie Fetzner,et al.  The Road to Retention: A Closer Look at Institutions that Achieve High Course Completion Rates. , 2019 .

[36]  Domingos Santos Martinho,et al.  Factors that Influence the Adoption of Postgraduate Online Courses , 2018, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[37]  D. Cafagna,et al.  Tecniche attive nella formazione per l'outplacement: gli interventi di gruppo migliorano il ricollocamento? , 2018 .

[38]  Marco Kalz,et al.  The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle (MOLAC): a reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[39]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[40]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009: A Review and Future Visions. , 2009, EDM 2009.

[41]  Ercan Kiraz,et al.  Design of a blended learning environment: Considerations and implementation issues , 2013 .

[42]  Lynna J. Ausburn.  Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: an American perspective , 2004 .

[43]  Å. Diseth,et al.  A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement. , 2010, The British journal of educational psychology.

[44]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[45]  Marcel A. Croon,et al.  Looking for students’ personal characteristics predicting study outcome , 2011 .

[46]  Kıymet Selvi,et al.  Motivating factors in online courses , 2010 .

[47]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Learning dispositions and transferable competencies: pedagogy, modelling and learning analytics , 2012, International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.

[48]  Alfred Joseph Lizzio,et al.  University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice , 2002 .