Sustained response of galcanezumab in migraine prevention: Patient-level data from a post hoc analysis in patients with episodic or chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate, at population and individual patient levels, the sustained response of reduction in migraine headache days in patients with migraine treated with galcanezumab. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of double-blind galcanezumab studies in patients with migraine: two 6-month episodic migraine (EM; EVOLVE-1/EVOLVE-2), one 3-month chronic migraine (CM; REGAIN), and one 3-month treatment-resistant migraine (CONQUER). Patients received monthly subcutaneous galcanezumab 120 mg (after 240 mg initial loading dose), galcanezumab 240 mg, or placebo. In the EM and CM studies, the proportions of patients with ≥50% and ≥75% (EM only) reduction from baseline in average monthly migraine headache days from Months 1 to 3 and Months 4 to 6 were evaluated. A mean monthly response rate was estimated. The sustained effect was defined as maintaining ≥50% response for ≥3 consecutive months in the patient-level data for EM and CM. RESULTS A total of 3348 patients with EM or CM from the EVOLVE-1/EVOLVE-2 (placebo, n = 894, galcanezumab, n = 879), REGAIN (placebo, n = 558, galcanezumab, n = 555), and CONQUER (EM: placebo, n = 132, galcanezumab, n = 137; CM: placebo, n = 98, galcanezumab, n = 95) studies were included. Patients were predominantly female, White, and had monthly migraine headache day averages ranging from 9.1 to 9.5 days (EM) and 18.1 to 19.6 days (CM). In patients with EM and CM, 19.0% and 22.6% of galcanezumab-treated patients, respectively, had significantly higher maintenance of ≥50% response for all months in the double-blind period compared to 8.0% and 1.5% of placebo-treated patients. The odds ratios (OR) of achieving clinical response for EM and CM were double with galcanezumab (OR = 3.0 [95% CI 1.8, 4.8] and OR = 6.3 [95% CI 1.7, 22.7], respectively). At the individual patient level, of patients who had ≥75% response at Month 3 in the galcanezumab 120 and 240 mg dose groups and placebo group, 39.9% (55/138) and 43.0% (61/142), respectively, of galcanezumab-treated patients maintained ≥75% response during Months 4-6 compared to 32.7% (51/156) with placebo. CONCLUSION More galcanezumab-treated patients achieved ≥50% response within the first 3 months of treatment compared to placebo; responses were sustained during Months 4-6. The odds of achieving ≥50% response were double with galcanezumab.

[1]  U. Bingel,et al.  The beneficial effect of positive treatment expectations on pharmacological migraine prophylaxis. , 2021, Pain.

[2]  E. Loder,et al.  The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: Updated age, sex, and socioeconomic‐specific estimates from government health surveys , 2020, Headache.

[3]  The American Headache Society Position Statement On Integrating New Migraine Treatments Into Clinical Practice , 2018, Headache.

[4]  S. Aurora,et al.  Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies , 2018, The Journal of Headache and Pain.

[5]  S. Aurora,et al.  Analysis of Initial Nonresponders to Galcanezumab in Patients With Episodic or Chronic Migraine: Results From the EVOLVE‐1, EVOLVE‐2, and REGAIN Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Studies , 2018, Headache.

[6]  E. Pearlman,et al.  100% Response Rate to Galcanezumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Results From Phase 3, Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled EVOLVE‐1 and EVOLVE‐2 Studies , 2018, Headache.

[7]  R. Conley,et al.  Evaluation of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: The EVOLVE-1 Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, JAMA neurology.

[8]  M. Matharu,et al.  Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: Results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial , 2018, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[9]  E. Loder,et al.  The Prevalence and Impact of Migraine and Severe Headache in the United States: Figures and Trends From Government Health Studies , 2018, Headache.

[10]  T. Kube,et al.  Patients’ Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[11]  D. Dodick,et al.  Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: A retrospective claims analysis , 2016, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[12]  D. Dodick,et al.  Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine , 2015, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[13]  L. Bloudek,et al.  Systematic Review of Migraine Prophylaxis Adherence and Persistence , 2014, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[14]  R. Ohrbach,et al.  The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) , 2013, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[15]  W. Becker,et al.  Patterns of Use and Reasons for Discontinuation of Prophylactic Medications for Episodic Migraine and Chronic Migraine: Results From the Second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS‐II) , 2013, Headache.

[16]  L. Kelman The broad treatment expectations of migraine patients , 2006, The Journal of Headache and Pain.