Optical proximity stability control of ArF immersion clusters

Once a process is set-up in an integrated circuit (IC) manufacturer's fabrication environment, any drift in the proximity fingerprint of the cluster will negatively impact the yield. In complement to the dose, focus and overlay control of the cluster, it is therefore also of ever growing importance to monitor and maintain the proximity stability (or CD through pitch behavior) of each cluster. In this paper, we report on an experimental proximity stability study of an ASML XT:1900i cluster for a 32 nm poly process from four different angles. First, we demonstrate the proximity stability over time by weekly wafer exposure and CD through pitch measurements. Second, we investigate proximity stability from tool-to-tool. In a third approach, the stability over the exposure field (intra-field through-pitch CD uniformity) is investigated. Finally, we verify that proximity is maintained through the lot when applying lens heating correction. Monitoring and maintaining the scanner's optical proximity through time, through the lot, over the field, and from toolto- tool, involves extensive CD metrology through pitch. In this work, we demonstrate that fast and precise CD through pitch data acquisition can be obtained by scatterometry (ASML YieldStarTM S-100), which significantly reduces the metrology load. The results of this study not only demonstrate the excellent optical proximity stability on a XT:1900i exposure cluster for a 32 nm poly process, but also show how scatterometry enables thorough optical proximity control in a fabrication environment.

[1]  Yu Cao,et al.  Understanding illumination effects for control of optical proximity effects (OPE) , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  S. Hunsche,et al.  Characterization and control of dynamic lens heating effects under high volume manufacturing conditions , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Klaus Simon,et al.  Imaging performance optimization for hyper-NA scanner systems in high volume production , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Xu Xie,et al.  Improved fab CDU with FlexRay and LithoTuner , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Wenzhan Zhou,et al.  Proximity matching for 193 nm scanner using scatterometry , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  G. Vandenberghe,et al.  Scanner matching for standard and freeform illumination shapes using FlexRay , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  G. Vandenberghe,et al.  Freeform illumination sources: an experimental study of source-mask optimization for 22-nm SRAM cells , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Oscar Noordman,et al.  Generation of arbitrary freeform source shapes using advanced illumination systems in high-NA immersion scanners , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Tomoyuki Matsuyama,et al.  Pupilgram adjusting scheme using intelligent illuminator for ArF immersion exposure tool , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Bruno La Fontaine,et al.  Extending scatterometry to the measurements of sub 40 nm features, double patterning structures, and 3D OPC patterns , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Peter Vanoppen,et al.  3D features measurement using YieldStar, an angle resolved polarized scatterometer , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Jason Shieh,et al.  Immersion scanner proximity matching using angle resolving scatterometry metrology , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Oscar Noordman,et al.  Performance of FlexRay: a fully programmable illumination system for generation of freeform sources on high NA immersion systems , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  Tool-to-tool optical proximity effect matching , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.