Neoconstructivism: The New Science of Cognitive Development

Arguments over the developmental origins of human knowledge are ancient, founded in the writings of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Hume, and Kant. They have also persisted long enough to become a core area of inquiry in cognitive and developmental science. Empirical contributions to these debates, however, appeared only in the last century, when Jean Piaget offered the first viable theory of knowledge acquisition that centered on the great themes discussed by Kant: object, space, time, and causality. The essence of Piaget's theory is constructivism: The building of concepts from simpler perceptual and cognitive precursors, in particular from experience gained through manual behaviors and observation. The constructivist view was disputed by a generation of researchers dedicated to the idea of the "competent infant," endowed with knowledge (say, of permanent objects) that emerged prior to facile manual behaviors. Taking this possibility further, it has been proposed that many fundamental cognitive mechanisms - reasoning, event prediction, decision-making, hypothesis testing, and deduction - operate independently of all experience, and are, in this sense, innate. The competent-infant view has an intuitive appeal, attested to by its widespread popularity, and it enjoys a kind of parsimony: It avoids the supposed philosophical pitfall posed by having to account for novel forms of knowledge in inductive learners. But this view leaves unaddressed a vital challenge: to understand the mechanisms by which new knowledge arises. This challenge has now been met. The neoconstructivist approach is rooted in Piaget's constructivist emphasis on developmental mechanisms, yet also reflects modern advances in our understanding of learning mechanisms, cortical development, and modeling. This book brings together, for the first time, theoretical views that embrace computational models and developmental neurobiology, and emphasize the interplay of time, experience, and cortical architecture to explain emergent knowledge, with an empirical line of research identifying a set of general-purpose sensory, perceptual, and learning mechanisms that guide knowledge acquisition across different domains and through development.

[1]  John Cerella,et al.  Pigeons and perceptrons , 1986, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole,et al.  Word meaning biases or language-specific effects? Evidence from English, Spanish and Korean , 1997 .

[4]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Rapid categorization of foveal and extrafoveal natural images: Associated ERPs and effects of lateralization , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  E. Rolls High-level vision: Object recognition and visual cognition, Shimon Ullman. MIT Press, Bradford (1996), ISBN 0 262 21013 4 , 1997 .

[6]  Brian J. Stankiewicz Just another view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features , 2004, Neural Networks.

[8]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Book Reviews: The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000, CL.

[10]  Asaid Khateb,et al.  Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: Where and when it occurs , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[11]  J. Paillard Brain and space , 1991 .

[12]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Object name learning and object perception: a deficit in late talkers , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[13]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[14]  M T Turvey,et al.  Nonvisible perception of segments of a hand-held object and the attitude spinor. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[16]  F. Keil Mapping the mind: The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things , 1994 .

[17]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual Object Recognition , 1996, ISTCS.

[19]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  J. Freyd,et al.  Representing the dynamics of a static form , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[21]  A B Sekuler,et al.  Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[22]  L. Namy Symbol use and symbolic representation : developmental and comparative perspectives , 2005 .

[23]  L. McCune,et al.  A normative study of representational play in the transition to language. , 1995 .

[24]  A. Needham,et al.  A pick-me-up for infants’ exploratory skills: Early simulated experiences reaching for objects using ‘sticky mittens’ enhances young infants’ object exploration skills , 2002 .

[25]  G. Edelman Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[26]  I Biederman,et al.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[27]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  ' s personal copy Simplicity and generalization : Short-cutting abstraction in children ’ s object categorizations , 1997 .

[28]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[29]  Taosheng Liu,et al.  Explicit and implicit memory for rotating objects. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation, similarity, and the chorus of prototypes , 1993, Minds and Machines.

[31]  N. Soja Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax , 1992 .

[32]  Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al.  Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Gilhodes,et al.  Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: a comparison between handwriting and typing. , 2006, Human movement science.

[34]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Learning to recognize objects , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[35]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Visuomotor Coordination: From Neural Nets to Schema Theory , 1984 .

[36]  L. McCune-Nicolich Toward Symbolic Functioning: Structure of Early Pretend Games and Potential Parallels with Language. , 1981 .

[37]  L. Cohen,et al.  Infants’ Use of Functional Parts in Basic-like Categorization , 1999 .

[38]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[39]  D I Perrett,et al.  Characteristic Views and the Visual Inspection of Simple Faceted and Smooth Objects: ‘Tetrahedra and Potatoes’ , 1988, Perception.

[40]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Similarity, Connectionism, and the Problem of Representation in Vision , 1997, Neural Computation.

[41]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[42]  A Yonas,et al.  What's in a shape? Children represent shape variability differently than adults when naming objects. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[43]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Attention in early development , 1996 .

[44]  W. Hayward After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Infants' use of object parts in early categorization. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[47]  A. Landi Human Hand Function , 2007 .

[48]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Mary Target,et al.  Society for Research in Child Development , 1997 .

[50]  S. Palmer,et al.  Effects of motion on perceived pointing of ambiguous triangles , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  J. Perner Understanding the Representational Mind , 1993 .

[52]  M. Goodale,et al.  Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition , 1999, Current Biology.

[53]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[54]  J M Findlay,et al.  The Effect of Depth Rotation on Object Identification , 1997, Perception.

[55]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[56]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[57]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[58]  M. Jeannerod The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  P. Jolicoeur The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[60]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Where View-based Theories Break Down: The Role of Structure in Shape Perception and Object Recognition , 2000 .

[61]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Infants' attention to object structure in early categorization. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[62]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[63]  P. Kellman Separating processes in object perception. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[64]  C. Nelson The Development and Neural Bases of Face Recognition , 2001 .

[65]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Mental and manual rotation. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shifting ontological boundaries: how Japanese‐ and English‐speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts , 2003 .

[67]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  Mary-Ellen Large,et al.  The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The role of experience and discourse in children´s developing understanding of pretend play actions , 2006 .

[70]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  View dependence in scene recognition after active learning , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[71]  M. Harries,et al.  Use of Preferential Inspection to Define the Viewing Sphere and Characteristic Views of an Arbitrary Machined Tool Part , 1992, Perception.

[72]  Nathan Intrator,et al.  Learning as Extraction of Low-Dimensional Representations , 1997 .

[73]  M J Tarr,et al.  What Object Attributes Determine Canonical Views? , 1999, Perception.

[74]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Identification of Disoriented Objects: A Dual‐systems Theory , 1990 .

[75]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual Frames of Reference and Two-Dimensional Shape Recognition: Further Examination of Internal Axes , 1993, Perception.

[76]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[77]  Mark Wexler,et al.  Depth perception by the active observer , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? , 1999, Cognition.

[79]  M. Goodale,et al.  Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[80]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Children's Theories of Word Meaning: The Role of Shape Similarity in Early Acquisition , 1994 .

[81]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age. , 2009, Developmental science.

[82]  A. Grafstein MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000 .

[83]  G K Humphrey,et al.  An Examination of the Effects of Axis Foreshortening, Monocular Depth Cues, and Visual Field on Object Identification , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[84]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[85]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[86]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Developing object concepts in infancy: an associative learning perspective. , 2008, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[87]  I Law,et al.  Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition A PET Study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[88]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[89]  K. James,et al.  Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory–motor brain network , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[90]  Steven M. Finbeiner,et al.  The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements , 1989, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[91]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[92]  A B Sekuler,et al.  Axis of elongation can determine reference frames for object perception. , 1996, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[93]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  First sentences in language and symbolic play. , 1984 .

[94]  Virginia A. Marchman,et al.  MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories , 2006 .

[95]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Perceptual Cues in Pure Alexia , 1996 .

[96]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[97]  R. Efron,et al.  What is Perception , 1969 .

[98]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[99]  M. Goodale,et al.  The objects of action and perception , 1998, Cognition.

[100]  E. Bushnell,et al.  Motor development and the mind: the potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. , 1993, Child development.

[101]  P. Viviani,et al.  Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[102]  K. Morikawa,et al.  Symmetry and elongation of objects influence perceived direction of translational motion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[103]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning. , 2005, Psychological review.

[104]  I Biederman,et al.  Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[105]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape and the first hundred nouns. , 2004, Child development.

[106]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  What's in View for Toddlers? Using a Head Camera to Study Visual Experience. , 2008, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.