Area Estimation of World Regions and the Projection of the Global-Scale Cognitive Map

For global-scale geographic information, there are relatively few sources that can be used to form or structure a cognitive map. One of the most common sources for this information is maps, the only reference that permits an individual a comprehensive view of the world without having to integrate information from multiple views (e.g., stitching together the two halves of a globe or assembling the pages of an atlas). It has been frequently stated that visual experience with the map projections used for global-scale mapping, specifically the Mercator projection, has a strong influence on the shape and structure of an individual's global-scale cognitive map. In this article, we examine this belief by conducting two studies on the relationship between memory- and inference-derived estimates of land area and the actual land areas of regions on the Earth. Numerical and graphical estimation techniques were used to obtain area estimates. We examined the results for relationships between distortion in estimated area and area as displayed in common map projections such as the Mercator projection, as well as for general trends in the estimation patterns. Nonequal area projections, particularly the Mercator projection, were found not to have much if any influence on the shape of participants' cognitive maps. Instead, we found estimates to be fairly accurate relative to actual area, and that the estimation pattern most clearly reflected standard trends in psychophysical estimation.

[1]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Global-scale location and distance estimates: common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How Maps Work - Representation, Visualization, and Design , 1995 .

[3]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[4]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Maps as Representations: Expert Novice Comparison of Projection Understanding , 2002 .

[6]  Gordon O. Ewing,et al.  ON THE SENSITIVITY OF CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE BASES OF COGNITIVE DISTANCE , 1981 .

[7]  Arthur H. Robinson RECTANGULAR WORLD MAPS—NO! , 1990 .

[8]  J C Baird,et al.  Studies of the cognitive representation of spatial relations: II. A familiar environment. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: investigating configurational knowledge , 1996 .

[10]  Tlc Griffin GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL VARIATIONS IN JUDGMENT AND THEIR RELEVANCE TO THE SCALING OF GRADUATED CIRCLES , 1985 .

[11]  S S Stevens,et al.  Neural events and psychophysical law. , 1971, Science.

[12]  J. S Rowlinson Flattening the earth , 2006, Notes and Records of the Royal Society.

[13]  J. Flannery THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME COMMON GRADUATED POINT SYMBOLS IN THE PRESENTATION OF QUANTITATIVE DATA , 1971 .

[14]  John J. Chiodo Improving the Cognitive Development of Students' Mental Maps of the World , 1997 .

[15]  J. Hudson A DIAMOND ANNIVERSARY , 1979 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[17]  Francis D. Hole The Look of Maps , 1952 .

[18]  Mark Monmonier,et al.  Rhumb Lines and Map Wars: A Social History of the Mercator Projection , 2004 .

[19]  John C. Baird,et al.  Psychophysical analysis of visual space , 1974 .

[20]  M. Teghtsoonian THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  D. B. MacKay The Effect of Spatial Stimuli on the Estimation of Cognitive Maps , 2010 .

[22]  Robert E. Krider,et al.  Pizzas: p or Square? Psychophysical Biases in Area Comparisons , 2001 .

[23]  Robert Lloyd,et al.  Spatial Cognition: Geographic Environments , 1997 .

[25]  Kang-tsung Chang Circle Size Judgment and Map Design , 1980 .

[26]  P. Vujaković Mapping the War Zone: cartography, geopolitics and security discourse in the UK press , 2002 .

[27]  Thomas Spiritoso,et al.  Stimulus Complexity and the Judgement of Relative Size , 1962 .

[28]  A Friedman,et al.  Reasoning about geography. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[30]  William Ravenhill,et al.  Flattening the earth , 1994 .

[31]  R. Cheloha,et al.  The of a Development , 2004 .

[32]  R. Siegler,et al.  Metrics and mappings: a framework for understanding real-world quantitative estimation. , 1993, Psychological review.

[33]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space , 1993, COSIT.

[34]  Lynn S. Liben,et al.  The development of expertise in geography : A cognitive developmental approach to geographic education , 1991 .

[35]  Robert Lloyd,et al.  Self-Organized Cognitive Maps , 2000 .

[36]  D. W. Ricker,et al.  Spatial Representation , 2021, Problem Solving in Mathematics and Beyond.

[37]  J. Pinheiro Determinants of cognitive maps of the world as expressed in sketch maps , 1998 .

[38]  John P. Snyder,et al.  Map Projection Transformation: Principles and Applications , 1999 .

[39]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[40]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Memory of Real Environments, Virtual Environments, and Maps , 2004 .

[41]  D. M. MacKay,et al.  Psychophysics of Perceived Intensity: A Theoretical Basis for Fechner's and Stevens' Laws , 1963, Science.

[42]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  David M. Mark,et al.  Naive Geography , 1995, COSIT.

[44]  T. Saarinen,et al.  Relative Size of Continents on World Sketch Maps , 1996 .

[45]  T. Saarinen CENTERING OF MENTAL MAPS OF THE WORLD , 2007 .

[46]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Memory psychophysics for visual area and length , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Cognitive Map-Design Research in the Twentieth Century: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches , 2002 .