Environmental effects on chrome-free leather

Chrome-free leather has gradually gained commercial importance, particularly for automobile upholstery applications. In many respects, however, chrome-free leather is inferior to chrome-tanned leather. UV and heat are known to be more detrimental to chrome-free leather than to chrome-tanned leather, especially in regard to the colorfastness of dyestuff and mechanical properties. Te mperature, UV radiation, and humidity are key environmental factors that affect leather properties. The role of humidity and its interaction with UV radiation and temperature on leather properties, however, are not clear to the leather industry, and this information is needed for formulation of antioxidants that will protect chrome-free leather from UV and heat damage. Therefore, a systematic study was performed to formulate the relationship between these three environmental variables and resultant colorfastness and mechanical properties. A second order regression equation was derived to plot response surfaces that clearly illustrate the relationship between the environmental variables and colorfastness, as well as the resultant physical properties. Observations showed an intriguing interaction between humidity and radiation dosage. Measurements revealed that an increase in humidity resulted in a decrease in colorfastness and mechanical strength. However, after the UV radiation dosage reaches a certain level, an increase in humidity may actually help maintain both properties. Observation showed the stiffness decreased steadily with humidity, whereas the toughness index slightly increased with humidity. This study also used differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to determine the denaturation temperature as a function of various environmental conditions. We observed a correlation between colorfastness and the denaturation temperature.

[1]  C. K. Liu,et al.  AN ENERGY APPROACH TO THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF LEATHER , 1998 .

[2]  B. Eberlein-König,et al.  Protective effect against sunburn of combined systemic ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and d-alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E). , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  E. Fujimori,et al.  Ultraviolet light‐induced change in collagen macromolecules , 1965, Biopolymers.

[4]  B. Ames,et al.  Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  R. A. Hancock,et al.  Use of DSC to detect the heterogeneity of hydrothermal stability in the polyphenol-treated collagen matrix. , 2003, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[6]  E. Leikina,et al.  Type I collagen is thermally unstable at body temperature , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  L. Machlin Vitamin E: A Comprehensive Treatise , 1980 .

[8]  Charles Hugh Giles,et al.  A laboratory course in dyeing , 1971 .

[9]  A. Sionkowska Photochemical transformations in collagen in the presence of melanin , 1999 .

[10]  William N. Marmer,et al.  Overview of the USDA hides and leather research program , 2001 .

[11]  C. Lacabanne,et al.  Thermally stimulated current changes of irradiated skin , 1996 .

[12]  E. J. Miller,et al.  Physical crosslinking of collagen fibers: comparison of ultraviolet irradiation and dehydrothermal treatment. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.