Objective quality metrics for video scalability

Scalable video coding is emerging as an efficient alternative to simulcast encoding to distribute the same video content simultaneously to many users having different terminals and network conditions. In order to select the best combination of video scalability options for a given network condition and content, the availability of objective metrics that can reliably predict the video quality of scalable video sequence is crucial. In this paper, we propose a performance evaluation study of a set of state of the art Full-Reference and No-Reference metrics, considering a public database of test video sequences and related subjective quality annotations. The results demonstrate that most of the considered metrics show lack of robustness as predictors of subjective quality when both spatial and temporal quality distortions occur.

[1]  D. Zagar,et al.  Comparison of objective quality assessment methods for scalable video coding , 2012, Proceedings ELMAR-2012.

[2]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  A no-reference perceptual blur metric , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Subjective Quality Evaluation via Paired Comparison: Application to Scalable Video Coding , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[4]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Measuring Video Quality on Full Scalability of H.264/AVC Scalable Video Coding , 2008, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Christian Timmerer,et al.  Using Scalable Video Coding for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP in mobile environments , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[6]  Patricia Ladret,et al.  The blur effect: perception and estimation with a new no-reference perceptual blur metric , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Avideh Zakhor,et al.  An optimization approach for removing blocking effects in transform coding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[8]  Jianfei Cai,et al.  Three Dimensional Scalable Video Adaptation via User-End Perceptual Quality Assessment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[9]  A. Bovik,et al.  OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[10]  Jong-Seok Lee Comparison of objective quality metrics on the scalable extension of H.264/AVC , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Wesley De Neve,et al.  Full-Reference Video Quality Metric for Fully Scalable and Mobile SVC Content , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[12]  Rosario El-Feghali,et al.  Quality metric for video sequences with temporal scalability , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[13]  Eckehard G. Steinbach,et al.  A novel full-reference video quality metric and its application to wireless video transmission , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Christian Keimel,et al.  Improving the verification process of video quality metrics , 2009, 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[15]  H.R. Wu,et al.  A generalized block-edge impairment metric for video coding , 1997, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[16]  Stephen Wolf,et al.  Video Quality Model for Variable Frame Delay (VQM_VFD) , 2011 .

[17]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.