Circularity in the built environment – a call for a paradigm shift

This chapter considers how circularity is being, and might be, approached and achieved within the built environment. Three case studies illustrate the current situation. The first case address life cycle assessment (LCA) in measuring circularity, showing that while LCA encourages recycling it gives little support to Design for Disassembly. The second considers how multiple decision support tools can act to limit early design input by end users, and therefore limit the long-term sustainability of the building. The third demonstrates the importance of incorporating the needs of users and owners in the management of existing commercial buildings. While therefore circular economy principles are enacted to an extent at present, social needs are seldom adequately considered. This analysis is used to propose a new dynamic framework for a circular built environment, redefined as the outcome of an iterative process to provide for our human needs using the least resources.

[1]  N. Bocken,et al.  Circular Economy in the building sector: Three cases and a collaboration tool , 2018 .

[2]  Daniel K. Jonsson,et al.  The Nature of Infrasystem Services , 2005 .

[3]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[4]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework , 2017 .

[5]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  Design and construction strategies for reducing embodied impacts from buildings – Case study analysis , 2018 .

[6]  N. Bocken,et al.  Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy , 2016 .

[7]  C. Tweed,et al.  Built Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Urban Development , 2007 .

[8]  Morten Birkved,et al.  Upcycling and Design for Disassembly – LCA of buildings employing circular design strategies , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[9]  B. Frostell,et al.  The Socio-Economic Embeddedness of the Circular Economy: An Integrative Framework , 2018, Sustainability.

[10]  K. Xing,et al.  Toward a Resource‐Efficient Built Environment: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model , 2017 .

[11]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  Analysing methodological choices in calculations of embodied energy and GHG emissions from buildings , 2018 .

[12]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review , 2017 .

[13]  David Cheshire,et al.  Building Revolutions: Applying the Circular Economy to the Built Environment , 2016 .

[14]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  Constructing sustainability : connecting the social and the technical in a case study of school building projects , 2012 .