Evidence for split attentional foci.

A partial report procedure was used to test the ability of observers to split attention over noncontiguous locations. Observers reported the identity of 2 targets that appeared within a 5 x 5 stimulus array, and cues (validity = 80%) informed them of the 2 most likely target locations. On invalid trials, 1 of the targets appeared directly in between the cued locations. Experiments 1, 1a, and 2 showed a strong accuracy advantage at cued locations compared with intervening ones. This effect was larger when the cues were arranged horizontally rather than vertically. Experiment 3 suggests that this effect of cue orientation reflects an advantage for processing targets that appear in different hemifields. Experiments 4 and 4a suggest that the primary mechanism supporting the flexible deployment of spatial attention is the suppression of interference from stimuli at unattended locations.

[1]  T. R. Kumar.  The spatial distribution , 2000 .

[2]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[4]  M. Cheal,et al.  Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. Henderson.  Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  S J Luck,et al.  Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[8]  H. Pashler,et al.  Negligible Effect of Spatial Precuing on Identification of Single Digits , 1994 .

[9]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention , 1993 .

[11]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Electrocortical Substrates of Visual Selective Attention , 1993 .

[14]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  R Klein,et al.  The spatial distribution of attention during covert visual orienting. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[17]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[18]  M. Kinsbourne.  Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[19]  M. Jeannerod.  Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[20]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  H. Hughes,et al.  Spatial maps of directed visual attention. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  D. Willey.  Measuring reaction time , 1985 .

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  R. Davis,et al.  Timing the transfer of information between hemispheres in man. , 1971, Acta psychologica.

[25]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Visual perceptual rate under two conditions of search. , 1969, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[26]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.