Two Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Semantic Integration during the Comprehension of Visual Real-world Events

How do comprehenders build up overall meaning representations of visual real-world events? This question was examined by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants viewed short, silent movie clips depicting everyday events. In two experiments, it was demonstrated that presentation of the contextually inappropriate information in the movie endings evoked an anterior negativity. This effect was similar to the N400 component whose amplitude has been previously reported to inversely correlate with the strength of semantic relationship between the context and the eliciting stimulus in word and static picture paradigms. However, a second, somewhat later, ERP componenta posterior late positivitywas evoked specifically when target objects presented in the movie endings violated goal-related requirements of the action constrained by the scenario context (e.g., an electric iron that does not have a sharp-enough edge was used in place of a knife in a cutting bread scenario context). These findings suggest that comprehension of the visual real world might be mediated by two neurophysiologically distinct semantic integration mechanisms. The first mechanism, reflected by the anterior N400-like negativity, maps the incoming information onto the connections of various strengths between concepts in semantic memory. The second mechanism, reflected by the posterior late positivity, evaluates the incoming information against the discrete requirements of real-world actions. We suggest that there may be a tradeoff between these mechanisms in their utility for integrating across people, objects, and actions during event comprehension, in which the first mechanism is better suited for familiar situations, and the second mechanism is better suited for novel situations.

[1]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[2]  F. Hesse,et al.  Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activitiy sequences? , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[3]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  M. Kutas,et al.  The Search for Common Sense: An Electrophysiological Study of the Comprehension of Words and Pictures in Reading , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies , 2002, Neuroreport.

[6]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  David J. Freedman,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: categories, concepts and cognition. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  The neural organization of semantic memory: Electrophysiological activity suggests feature-based segregation , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[9]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[10]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  M. Jung-Beeman Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Phillip J Holcomb,et al.  Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences , 2006 .

[14]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Understanding events : from perception to action , 2008 .

[15]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[16]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  J. Kounios,et al.  Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Right Hemisphere Activation of Joke-related Information: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[20]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  I. Fischler,et al.  Effects of constraint and validity of sentence contexts on lexical decisions , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[24]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Cortex: Neurophysiology and Behavior Visual Categorization and the Primate Prefrontal , 2006 .

[25]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[29]  P. Gordon,et al.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[32]  M. Kutas In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects , 1993 .

[33]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: rules without symbols. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  P. Holcomb,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[37]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .

[38]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  The influence on cognitive processing from the switches of shooting angles in videos of real-world events: An ERP study , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  J. Grose-Fifer,et al.  Priming by natural category membership in the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[42]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[43]  A. Friederici,et al.  Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing , 2003 .

[44]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  J. Fuster Network memory , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[46]  Marianna D. Eddy,et al.  Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials: a new approach for tracking the time-course of object perception. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[47]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[48]  L. Deouell,et al.  ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object–scene processing , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2001, Science.

[50]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[51]  T G Bever,et al.  Segmentation in cinema perception. , 1976, Science.

[52]  David J. Freedman,et al.  A Comparison of Primate Prefrontal and Inferior Temporal Cortices during Visual Categorization , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Lee R. Bobker,et al.  Making movies: from script to screen , 1973 .

[54]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Neural correlates of categories and concepts , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[55]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[56]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[59]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[60]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article THE EFFECT OF IMPLIED ORIENTATION DERIVED FROM VERBAL CONTEXT ON PICTURE RECOGNITION , 2022 .

[61]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[62]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Human Comprehension , 2008 .

[63]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Meaning and modality: influences of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[65]  D. Caplan,et al.  The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.

[66]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[67]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Visual categorization and the primate prefrontal cortex: neurophysiology and behavior. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[69]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[70]  P. Holcomb,et al.  In: Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. , 2007 .