New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees.

PURPOSE In this article we propose and evaluate nonparametric tree classifiers that can handle non-normal data and a large number of possible predictors using the full set of standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph measurements for classifying glaucoma. METHODS The classifiers were trained and tested using standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters from examinations of 98 subjects with glaucoma and 98 normal subjects of the Erlangen Glaucoma Registry. All patients and control subjects were evaluated by 15 degrees -optic disc stereographs, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph measurements, standard computerized white-in-white perimetry, and 24-hour-intraocular pressure profiles. The subjects were matched by age and sex. Standard classification trees as well as bagged classification trees were used. The classification outcome of the trees was compared with the classification by two published linear discriminant functions based on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph variables with respect to their cross-validated misclassification error. RESULTS The bagged classification tree had the lowest misclassification error estimate of 14.8% with a sensitivity of 81.6% at a specificity of 88.8%. The cross-validated error rates of the two linear discriminant function procedures were 20.4% (sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 76.7%) and 20.6% (sensitivity 81.4%, specificity 77.3%) for our set of observations. Bagged classification trees were able to reduce the misclassification error of glaucoma classification. CONCLUSIONS Bagged classification trees promise to be a new and efficient approach for glaucoma classification using morphometric 2- and 3-dimensional data derived from the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, taking into account all given variables.

[1]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  J. Jonas,et al.  Histomorphometry of the human optic nerve. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  N. Swindale,et al.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Jost B Jonas,et al.  Preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis by confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic disc , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  R N Weinreb,et al.  Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  R N Weinreb,et al.  Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  M Schulzer,et al.  Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the heidelberg retina tomograph. , 1993, Journal of glaucoma.

[8]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Zum Einflu der Konturlinie auf die Exkavationsflche beim Heidelberg Retina Tomograph , 1996 .

[10]  P T de Jong,et al.  The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[11]  L. Breiman Arcing classifier (with discussion and a rejoinder by the author) , 1998 .

[12]  G A Cioffi,et al.  Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[13]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[14]  H. Taylor,et al.  Association of demographic, familial, medical, and ocular factors with intraocular pressure. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  A. Coleman,et al.  Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  G. Trick PRRP abnormalities in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  P A Sample,et al.  Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.

[18]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Improvements on Cross-Validation: The 632+ Bootstrap Method , 1997 .

[19]  Jost B. Jonas,et al.  Optic disk morphometry in high myopia , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[20]  N. Swindale,et al.  Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to Detect Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss , 1995, Journal of glaucoma.

[21]  J. Caprioli,et al.  Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  G. Georgopoulos,et al.  Risk Factors in Ocular Hypertension , 1997, European journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  P Martus,et al.  Multivariate approach for quantification of morphologic and functional damage in glaucoma. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  F. Horn,et al.  Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph , 1998, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[26]  G Zinser,et al.  Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[27]  G. Marchini,et al.  The Relationship between Intraocular Pressure and Glaucoma in a Defined Population , 2000, Ophthalmologica.

[28]  J. Jonas,et al.  Discriminant analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .