Mammographic microcalcifications and breast cancer tumorigenesis: a radiologic-pathologic analysis

BackgroundMicrocalcifications (MCs) are tiny deposits of calcium in breast soft tissue. Approximately 30% of early invasive breast cancers have fine, granular MCs detectable on mammography; however, their significance in breast tumorigenesis is controversial. This study had two objectives: (1) to find associations between mammographic MCs and tumor pathology, and (2) to compare the diagnostic value of mammograms and breast biopsies in identifying malignant MCs.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed for 937 women treated for breast cancer during 2000–2012 at St. Michael’s Hospital. Demographic information (age and menopausal status), tumor pathology (size, histology, grade, nodal status and lymphovascular invasion), hormonal status (ER and PR), HER-2 over-expression and presence of MCs were collected. Chi-square tests were performed for categorical variables and t-tests were performed for continuous variables. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 937 patient charts were included. About 38.3% of the patients presented with mammographic MCs on routine mammographic screening. Patients were more likely to have MCs if they were HER-2 positive (52.9%; p < 0.001). There was a significant association between MCs and peri-menopausal status with a mean age of 50 (64%; p = 0.012). Patients with invasive ductal carcinomas (40.9%; p = 0.001) were more likely to present with MCs than were patients with other tumor histologies. Patients with a heterogeneous breast density (p = 0.031) and multifocal breast disease (p = 0.044) were more likely to have MCs on mammograms. There was a positive correlation between MCs and tumor grade (p = 0.057), with grade III tumors presenting with the most MCs (41.3%). A total of 52.2% of MCs were missed on mammograms which were visible on pathology (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis is the largest study suggesting the appearance of MCs on mammograms is strongly associated with HER-2 over-expression, invasive ductal carcinomas, peri-menopausal status, heterogeneous breast density and multifocal disease.

[1]  A. Theocharis,et al.  Versican but not decorin accumulation is related to malignancy in mammographically detected high density and malignant-appearing microcalcifications in non-palpable breast carcinomas , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[2]  Interactions between BRCA2 protein and the meiosis-specific recombinase DMC1 , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[3]  L. Tabár,et al.  Thirty years of experience with mammography screening: a new approach to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[4]  Panagiota Ravazoula,et al.  Non‐palpable breast carcinomas: Correlation of mammographically detected malignant‐appearing microcalcifications and molecular prognostic factors , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[5]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Digital mammography: what do we and what don’t we know? , 2007, European Radiology.

[6]  V. Castronovo,et al.  Increased expression of osteonectin and osteopontin, two bone matrix proteins, in human breast cancer. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[7]  Marcia Koomen,et al.  Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[8]  H. Dinkel,et al.  Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ? , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  N. Hynes,et al.  The biology of erbB-2/neu/HER-2 and its role in cancer. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  L. Tabár,et al.  Breast cancer multifocality, disease extent, and survival. , 2011, Human pathology.

[11]  J. Griniatsos,et al.  The prognostic significance of breast tumour microcalcifications. , 1995, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .

[13]  Krisztina Boda,et al.  Casting-type calcifications on the mammogram suggest a higher probability of early relapse and death among high-risk breast cancer patients , 2007, Acta oncologica.

[14]  M. Morgan,et al.  Microcalcifications Associated with Breast Cancer: An Epiphenomenon or Biologically Significant Feature of Selected Tumors? , 2005, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[15]  S. Jeffrey,et al.  Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. , 2008, Radiology.

[16]  Yosef Yarden,et al.  Biology of HER2 and Its Importance in Breast Cancer , 2001, Oncology.

[17]  Yojana V Nalawade,et al.  Evaluation of breast calcifications , 2009, The Indian journal of radiology & imaging.

[18]  B. Cady,et al.  Casting-type calcifications with invasion and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a more aggressive disease? , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[19]  D. Hayes Disease related indicators for a proper choice of adjuvant treatments. , 2011, Breast.

[20]  V. Castronovo,et al.  Evidence that breast cancer associated microcalcifications are mineralized malignant cells. , 1998, International journal of oncology.

[21]  L. Mariani,et al.  Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumour characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  F. Alexander,et al.  The natural history of breast carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[23]  Screen-detected breast cancer: does presence of minimal signs on prior mammograms predict staging or grading of cancer? , 2011, Clinical radiology.

[24]  George Hermann,et al.  Mammographic Appearance of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Reflects Pathologic Characteristics , 2002, Annals of surgery.