Optimal firing planning on high efficient car via PSO algorithm

Recently, Honda Eco Mileage Challenge, which is one of the most important contests in the world to encourage high-efficient car and environmental protection, mainly has been attracted by the communities of mechanism engineering, control system, vehicle engineering and computer science, etc. Generally speaking, the final score of HEMC contest is mainly related to the number of the firing in the whole process. In essence, the firing planning problem is a typical constraint optimization problem with several objectives. In order to obtain the good score in the HEMC contest, the PSO algorithm is utilized to optimize the number of the firing, the concrete firing time and the concrete position of each track in the whole process. To demonstrate the effectiveness and high performance of PSO algorithm, numerical results in the firing planning problem can help the driver to provide the firing time and the concrete firing position in the F1 racing track.

[1]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[2]  Yoshikazu Fukuyama,et al.  A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment , 2000 .

[3]  Xuemei Ren,et al.  Tracking Multiple Targets with Adaptive Swarm Optimization , 2011, EvoApplications.

[4]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Mean and Variance of the Sampling Distribution of Particle Swarm Optimizers During Stagnation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Haibin Yu,et al.  A hybrid PSO-GD based intelligent method for machine diagnosis , 2006, Digit. Signal Process..

[6]  Farid Melgani,et al.  Clustering of Hyperspectral Images Based on Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  R. Eberhart,et al.  Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[8]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[9]  Shih-Wei Lin,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for parameter determination and feature selection of support vector machines , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[11]  Xuemei Ren,et al.  Adaptive swarm optimization for locating and tracking multiple targets , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  A hybrid particle swarm optimization-back-propagation algorithm for feedforward neural network training , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[13]  Maurice Clerc,et al.  The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[14]  Ioan Cristian Trelea,et al.  The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection , 2003, Inf. Process. Lett..

[15]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[16]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION 1 Locating and Tracking Multiple Dynamic Optima by a Particle Swarm Model Using Speciation , 2022 .

[17]  J. Fernández-Martínez,et al.  Stochastic Stability Analysis of the Linear Continuous and Discrete PSO Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.