Improving Student Engagement and Active Learning with Embedded Automated Self-assessment Quizzes: Case Study in Computer System Architecture Design

This article presents the application of integrating electronic automated self-assessment quizzes within a modern practical computer system architecture module to improve student engagement, learning and performance. Student engagement is a challenging factor within education, where students frequently disengage over module delivery and default to a passive learning style. Learner engagement and responses are crucial to the educator in order to gain insight of the learner’s knowledge base, which allows the educator to react accordingly to consolidate and improve student knowledge formation. Student active learning engagement provides students, an opportunity of applying their learning constructs to gain experience, self-correction, further understanding, build confidence, and develop learning constructs. Self-assessment quizzes were incorporated into the virtual learning environment for a module on computer system architecture to enable live lecture data on student learning constructs, while improving student confidence, further understanding and improved performance on the module.

[1]  Sangmin-Michelle Lee,et al.  The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  A. Bandura Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[3]  Ruben Morales-Menendez,et al.  Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences , 2019, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM).

[4]  David Money Harris,et al.  MIPSfpga: using a commercial MIPS soft-core in computer architecture education , 2017, IET Circuits Devices Syst..

[5]  M. Oliver,et al.  Electronic Voting Systems for Lectures then and Now: A Comparison of Research and Practice , 2007 .

[6]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Martin Valcke,et al.  The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best "blend" of lectures and guiding questions with feedback , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[9]  A. Yasnitsky Guest Editor's Introduction , 2010 .

[10]  Krista D. Glazewski Toward Understanding the Practice and Potential of Educational Technologies on Our Campuses: Should We Be Skeptics First? , 2018, Contemporary Technologies in Education.

[11]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice , 2016, Educational Psychology Review.

[12]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Francisco José García-Peñalvo,et al.  Interactive and collaborative technological ecosystems for improving academic motivation and engagement , 2019, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[14]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning , 2011 .