Constraint-induced therapy for moderate chronic upper extremity impairment after stroke

Primary objective. To explore the effectiveness of constraint-induced therapy (CIT) in the treatment of individuals with moderate chronic upper extremity paresis. Research design. Multiple case reports, pre–post-treatment comparisons as well as long-term follow-ups at 1 and 6 months after intervention. Methods and procedures. Seven subjects, each greater than 12 months post-stroke, participated in an intensive 3 weeks CIT programme. The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL) and Fugl-Meyer Evaluation (FM) were used to measure outcomes. Main outcomes and results. Subjects exhibited notable improvements in mean WMFT scores (0.25 point increase post-treatment, 0.38 point increase at 1-month follow-up, 0.44 point increase at 6-month follow-up). Similarly, improvements were seen for mean MAL (1.71 points for AS, 1.77 points for HW) and FM scores (6 points FM-UE, 6 points FM-TOT) post-treatment. Additional improvements were seen at some follow-up assessments. Conclusions. Subjects demonstrated gains in objective measures, however, did not regain normal functional ability of their paretic upper extremities. Further investigation of the effects of CIT in this population, as well the functional significance of the objective measures used is warranted.

[1]  P. Levine,et al.  Modified constraint-induced therapy in subacute stroke: a case report. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Thomas Elbert,et al.  Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[4]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. , 1997, NeuroRehabilitation.

[5]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: New approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. , 1999 .

[6]  S. Wolf,et al.  An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[7]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study , 2001, Journal of Neurology.

[8]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[9]  K. M. Anderson,et al.  Application of constraint-induced movement therapy for an individual with severe chronic upper-extremity hemiplegia. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[10]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Peter Levine,et al.  Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy after Subacute Stroke: A Preliminary Study , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  J. Sabari,et al.  Constraint-induced motor relearning after stroke: a naturalistic case report. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  S. Page,et al.  Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[15]  M. Folstein,et al.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. , 1993, JAMA.

[16]  S L Wolf,et al.  Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. , 1981, Physical therapy.

[17]  H. Flor,et al.  Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[18]  A. Dromerick,et al.  Does the Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Acute Rehabilitation Reduce Arm Impairment After Ischemic Stroke? , 2000, Stroke.

[19]  Peter Levine,et al.  Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[21]  E. Taub,et al.  Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. , 1999, Stroke.

[22]  S. Page,et al.  Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  B. Rosen,et al.  Motor Recovery and Cortical Reorganization after Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Stroke Patients: A Preliminary Study , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  E. Taub.  Movement In Nonhuman Primates Deprived Of Somatosensory Feedback , 1976, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[26]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy and massed practice. , 2000, Stroke.

[27]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[28]  P. Schmalbrock,et al.  Functional MRI Evidence of Cortical Reorganization in Upper-Limb Stroke Hemiplegia Treated with Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[29]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[31]  Lex M. Bouter,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy and massed practice [3] (multiple letters) , 2000 .

[32]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[33]  A Villringer,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.