A Fuzzy Behavioral TOPSIS Model in Manufacturing Environment

In this study, a novel fuzzy behavioral TOPSIS model was proposed. Sensitivity analysis is conducted according to the behavioral TOPSIS model parameter (λ) for the different case studies taken from the literature. The ranking results are slightly different according to different λ values. The results of the study can be used in material and manufacturing method selection problems.

[1]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment and ranking system of sport team formation based on objective-measured values of criteria set , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF) , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  M. K. Rathod,et al.  A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multiple criteria decision analysis with and without fuzzy environment , 2011 .

[4]  L. Anojkumar,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini,et al.  Proposing a new methodology for prioritising the investment strategies in the private sector of Iran , 2014 .

[8]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[9]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Turbine blade material selection using fuzzy analytic network process , 2012 .

[10]  Yanbing Ju,et al.  A novel multiple attribute material selection approach with uncertain membership linguistic information , 2014 .

[11]  T. Liao,et al.  A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method for material selection , 1996 .

[12]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach , 2008 .

[14]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[15]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  USAGE OF FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS IN SELECTION OF NONTRADITIONAL MANUFACTURING METHODS , 2014 .

[16]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[17]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection , 2006, Math. Comput. Model..

[18]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Development of a multi-attribute selection procedure for non-traditional machining processes , 2003 .

[19]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[22]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Performance analysis of Civil Engineering Journals based on the Web of Science® database , 2014 .

[23]  Won Kyung Kim,et al.  The behavioral TOPSIS , 2017, Expert systems with applications.

[24]  F. Lootsma.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis via Ratio and Difference Judgement , 1999 .